unextendable 0.1.5 → 0.1.6

data/CHANGELOG.rdoc

@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
 = Unextendable CHANGELOG
 
+== Version 0.1.6 (January 9, 2012)
+
+* Being able to tackle 'BlankObject instances' when extending:
+  A 'BlankObject class' is considered not to have meta_class and unextend defined, but does respond to extend (e.g. Liquid::Strainer)
+  See also: http://rubydoc.info/gems/liquid/2.3.0/Liquid/Strainer
+
 == Version 0.1.5 (July 1, 2011)
 
 * Fixed bug: respond_to? did not return true for a non-overridden instance method after extending an unextendable module

data/VERSION

@@ -1 +1 @@
-0.1.5
+0.1.6

data/lib/unextendable/object.rb

@@ -12,20 +12,24 @@ class Object
 
   def extend(*modules)
     modules.each do |mod|
-      wrap_unextendable_module mod if mod.unextendable?
-      add_extended_module mod
+      if respond_to?(:meta_class)
+        wrap_unextendable_module mod if mod.unextendable?
+        add_extended_module mod
+      end
       super(mod)
     end
   end
 
   def unextend(*modules, &block)
-    if modules.empty?
-      meta_class.extended_modules.delete_if do |mod|
-        unextend? mod, &block
-      end
-    else
-      modules.each do |mod|
-        meta_class.extended_modules.delete mod if unextend? mod, &block
+    if respond_to?(:meta_class)
+      if modules.empty?
+        meta_class.extended_modules.delete_if do |mod|
+          unextend? mod, &block
+        end
+      else
+        modules.each do |mod|
+          meta_class.extended_modules.delete mod if unextend? mod, &block
+        end
       end
     end
   end

data/lib/unextendable/version.rb

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 module Unextendable
   MAJOR = 0
   MINOR = 1
-  TINY  = 5
+  TINY  = 6
 
   VERSION = [MAJOR, MINOR, TINY].join(".")
 end

data/test/blank_object_test.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+require File.expand_path("../test_helper", __FILE__)
+
+class BlankObjectTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
+
+  # ==================================================================================================================================
+  # A BlankObject class is considered not to have meta_class and unextend defined, but does respond to extend (e.g. Liquid::Strainer)
+  # See also: http://rubydoc.info/gems/liquid/2.3.0/Liquid/Strainer
+  # ==================================================================================================================================
+
+  context "A blank object instance" do
+    setup do
+      module Hi
+        unextendable
+        def say_hi
+          "Hi!"
+        end
+      end
+      class BlankObject
+        def meta_class
+          raise NoMethodError
+        end
+        def unextend
+          raise NoMethodError
+        end
+        def respond_to?(symbol, include_private = false)
+          return false if %w(meta_class unextend).include? symbol.to_s
+          super
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    should "have extend defined" do
+      assert BlankObject.new.extend(Hi)
+    end
+
+    should "not have meta_class and unextend defined" do
+      assert_raises NoMethodError do
+        BlankObject.new.meta_class
+      end
+      assert_raises NoMethodError do
+        BlankObject.new.unextend
+      end
+    end
+
+    should "be extendable" do
+      b = BlankObject.new
+      b.extend Hi
+      assert_equal "Hi!", b.say_hi
+    end
+  end
+
+end

data/test/{object_instance_test.rb → object_test.rb}

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 require File.expand_path("../test_helper", __FILE__)
 
-class ObjectInstanceTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
+class ObjectTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
 
   context "An object instance" do
     setup do

metadata

@@ -1,50 +1,52 @@
---- !ruby/object:Gem::Specification 
+--- !ruby/object:Gem::Specification
 name: unextendable
-version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version 
+version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version
+  version: 0.1.6
   prerelease: 
-  version: 0.1.5
 platform: ruby
-authors: 
+authors:
 - Paul Engel
 autorequire: 
 bindir: bin
 cert_chain: []
-
-date: 2011-07-01 00:00:00 +02:00
-default_executable: 
-dependencies: 
-- !ruby/object:Gem::Dependency 
+date: 2012-01-09 00:00:00.000000000 Z
+dependencies:
+- !ruby/object:Gem::Dependency
   name: shoulda
-  prerelease: false
-  requirement: &id001 !ruby/object:Gem::Requirement 
+  requirement: &2152388140 !ruby/object:Gem::Requirement
     none: false
-    requirements: 
-    - - ">="
-      - !ruby/object:Gem::Version 
-        version: "0"
+    requirements:
+    - - ! '>='
+      - !ruby/object:Gem::Version
+        version: '0'
   type: :development
-  version_requirements: *id001
-- !ruby/object:Gem::Dependency 
-  name: mocha
   prerelease: false
-  requirement: &id002 !ruby/object:Gem::Requirement 
+  version_requirements: *2152388140
+- !ruby/object:Gem::Dependency
+  name: mocha
+  requirement: &2152384460 !ruby/object:Gem::Requirement
     none: false
-    requirements: 
-    - - ">="
-      - !ruby/object:Gem::Version 
-        version: "0"
+    requirements:
+    - - ! '>='
+      - !ruby/object:Gem::Version
+        version: '0'
   type: :development
-  version_requirements: *id002
-description: "Unextendable originated from the thought of being able to implement the State pattern within object instances using modules. In other words: I wanted object instances to behave dependent on their state using modules. I really want to use modules because they are commonly used to define a set of methods which you can extend within an object instance. Unfortunately, you cannot just unexclude a module. So after searching the web for solutions, I came across Mixology, evil-ruby and StatePattern. But they slightly did not fit the picture. So after doing some research, I came up with Unextendable."
-email: 
+  prerelease: false
+  version_requirements: *2152384460
+description: ! 'Unextendable originated from the thought of being able to implement
+  the State pattern within object instances using modules. In other words: I wanted
+  object instances to behave dependent on their state using modules. I really want
+  to use modules because they are commonly used to define a set of methods which you
+  can extend within an object instance. Unfortunately, you cannot just unexclude a
+  module. So after searching the web for solutions, I came across Mixology, evil-ruby
+  and StatePattern. But they slightly did not fit the picture. So after doing some
+  research, I came up with Unextendable.'
+email:
 - paul.engel@holder.nl
 executables: []
-
 extensions: []
-
 extra_rdoc_files: []
-
-files: 
+files:
 - .gitignore
 - CHANGELOG.rdoc
 - Gemfile
@@ -59,39 +61,38 @@ files:
 - lib/unextendable/version.rb
 - script/console
 - script/definitions.rb
+- test/blank_object_test.rb
 - test/module_test.rb
-- test/object_instance_test.rb
+- test/object_test.rb
 - test/test_helper.rb
 - unextendable.gemspec
-has_rdoc: true
 homepage: https://github.com/archan937/unextendable
 licenses: []
-
 post_install_message: 
 rdoc_options: []
-
-require_paths: 
+require_paths:
 - lib
-required_ruby_version: !ruby/object:Gem::Requirement 
+required_ruby_version: !ruby/object:Gem::Requirement
   none: false
-  requirements: 
-  - - ">="
-    - !ruby/object:Gem::Version 
-      version: "0"
-required_rubygems_version: !ruby/object:Gem::Requirement 
+  requirements:
+  - - ! '>='
+    - !ruby/object:Gem::Version
+      version: '0'
+required_rubygems_version: !ruby/object:Gem::Requirement
   none: false
-  requirements: 
-  - - ">="
-    - !ruby/object:Gem::Version 
-      version: "0"
+  requirements:
+  - - ! '>='
+    - !ruby/object:Gem::Version
+      version: '0'
 requirements: []
-
 rubyforge_project: unextendable
-rubygems_version: 1.6.2
+rubygems_version: 1.8.10
 signing_key: 
 specification_version: 3
-summary: A small gem making unextending extended module methods within object instances possible
-test_files: 
+summary: A small gem making unextending extended module methods within object instances
+  possible
+test_files:
+- test/blank_object_test.rb
 - test/module_test.rb
-- test/object_instance_test.rb
+- test/object_test.rb
 - test/test_helper.rb