tlaw 0.0.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- checksums.yaml +7 -0
- data/.codeclimate.yml +11 -0
- data/.yardopts +2 -0
- data/LICENSE.txt +22 -0
- data/README.md +438 -0
- data/examples/demo_base.rb +10 -0
- data/examples/forecast_io.rb +113 -0
- data/examples/forecast_io_demo.rb +72 -0
- data/examples/open_weather_map.rb +266 -0
- data/examples/open_weather_map_demo.rb +219 -0
- data/examples/tmdb_demo.rb +133 -0
- data/examples/urbandictionary_demo.rb +105 -0
- data/lib/tlaw.rb +67 -0
- data/lib/tlaw/api.rb +58 -0
- data/lib/tlaw/api_path.rb +137 -0
- data/lib/tlaw/data_table.rb +116 -0
- data/lib/tlaw/dsl.rb +511 -0
- data/lib/tlaw/endpoint.rb +132 -0
- data/lib/tlaw/namespace.rb +159 -0
- data/lib/tlaw/param.rb +155 -0
- data/lib/tlaw/param/type.rb +113 -0
- data/lib/tlaw/param_set.rb +111 -0
- data/lib/tlaw/response_processor.rb +124 -0
- data/lib/tlaw/util.rb +45 -0
- data/lib/tlaw/version.rb +7 -0
- data/tlaw.gemspec +53 -0
- metadata +265 -0
checksums.yaml
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
2
|
+
SHA1:
|
3
|
+
metadata.gz: 6d841ff577a627eeecb9897b2cf4a20778eef17c
|
4
|
+
data.tar.gz: f52b898df817a0982b98d05000dc71f1e35cabb4
|
5
|
+
SHA512:
|
6
|
+
metadata.gz: bbcbe2d3adbb328867b018d5664e2027191be9c47763ce8295bad2391a0ba9011af89fa073d920d016dc0f0ddf7f9c3fe60e1436458a88596658a6de93f6d28f
|
7
|
+
data.tar.gz: 63e85a71614104dff15bde2f9e188a16c8e72aadf3c037eeae06699e7ec9af612be73a2d5c1250fabccc31f8f1d159aa8f6ae1297cea13a04910c51868deb586
|
data/.codeclimate.yml
ADDED
data/.yardopts
ADDED
data/LICENSE.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
|
1
|
+
The MIT License (MIT)
|
2
|
+
|
3
|
+
Copyright (c) 2016 Victor 'zverok' Shepelev
|
4
|
+
|
5
|
+
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining
|
6
|
+
a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
|
7
|
+
"Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
|
8
|
+
without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish,
|
9
|
+
distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
|
10
|
+
permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to
|
11
|
+
the following conditions:
|
12
|
+
|
13
|
+
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
|
14
|
+
included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
|
15
|
+
|
16
|
+
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
|
17
|
+
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
|
18
|
+
MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
|
19
|
+
NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE
|
20
|
+
LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION
|
21
|
+
OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION
|
22
|
+
WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
|
data/README.md
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,438 @@
|
|
1
|
+
# TLAW - The Last API Wrapper
|
2
|
+
|
3
|
+
[](http://badge.fury.io/rb/tlaw)
|
4
|
+
[](https://travis-ci.org/molybdenum-99/tlaw)
|
5
|
+
[](https://coveralls.io/r/molybdenum-99/tlaw?branch=master)
|
6
|
+
|
7
|
+
**TLAW** (pronounce it like "tea+love"... or whatever) is the last (and
|
8
|
+
only) API wrapper framework for _get-only APIes_<sup>[*](#get-only-api)</sup>
|
9
|
+
(think weather, search, economical indicators, geonames and so on).
|
10
|
+
|
11
|
+
## Table Of Contents
|
12
|
+
|
13
|
+
* [Features](#features)
|
14
|
+
* [Why TLAW?](#why-tlaw)
|
15
|
+
* [Usage](#usage)
|
16
|
+
* [URLs and params description](#urls-and-params-description)
|
17
|
+
* [Response processing](#response-processing)
|
18
|
+
* [Flat hashes](#flat-hashes)
|
19
|
+
* [DataTable](#datatable)
|
20
|
+
* [Post-processing](#post-processing)
|
21
|
+
* [All at once](#all-at-once)
|
22
|
+
* [Documentability](#documentability)
|
23
|
+
* [Some demos](#some-demos)
|
24
|
+
* [Installation & compatibility](#installation-&-compatibility)
|
25
|
+
* [Upcoming features](#upcoming-features)
|
26
|
+
* [Get-only API](#get-only-api)
|
27
|
+
* [Current status](#current-status)
|
28
|
+
* [Links](#links)
|
29
|
+
* [Author](#author)
|
30
|
+
* [License](#license)
|
31
|
+
|
32
|
+
## Features
|
33
|
+
|
34
|
+
* **Pragmatic**: thorougly designed with tens of real world examples in mind,
|
35
|
+
not just your textbook's "perfect orthogonal REST API";
|
36
|
+
* **Opinionated**: goal is clean and logical Ruby libary, not just mechanical
|
37
|
+
1-by-1 endpoint-per-method wrapper for every fancy hivemind invention;
|
38
|
+
* **Easy and readable** definitions;
|
39
|
+
* **Discoverable**: once API defined in TLAW terms, you can easily investigate
|
40
|
+
it in runtime, obtain meaningful errors like "param `foo` is missing
|
41
|
+
while trying to access endpoint `bar`" and so on;
|
42
|
+
* **Sane metaprogramming**: allows to define entire branchy API wrapper with
|
43
|
+
tons of pathes and endpoints in really concise manner, while creating
|
44
|
+
_all_ corresponding classes/methods at definition time: so, at runtime
|
45
|
+
you have no 20-level dynamic dispatching, just your usual method calls
|
46
|
+
with clearly defined arguments and compact backtraces.
|
47
|
+
|
48
|
+
Take a look at our "model" OpenWeatherMap [wrapper](https://github.com/molybdenum-99/tlaw/blob/master/examples/open_weather_map.rb)
|
49
|
+
and [demo](https://github.com/molybdenum-99/tlaw/blob/master/examples/open_weather_map_demo.rb)
|
50
|
+
of its usage, showing how all those things work in reality.
|
51
|
+
|
52
|
+
## Why TLAW?
|
53
|
+
|
54
|
+
There are ton of small (and not-so-small) useful APIs about world around:
|
55
|
+
weather, movies, geographical features, dictionaries, world countries
|
56
|
+
statistics... Typically, when trying to use one of them from Ruby (or,
|
57
|
+
to be honest, from any programming language), you are stuck with two
|
58
|
+
options:
|
59
|
+
|
60
|
+
1. Study and use (or invent and build) some custom hand-made Wrapper
|
61
|
+
Library™ with ton of very custom design decisions (should responses
|
62
|
+
be just hashes, or [Hashie](https://github.com/intridea/hashie), or
|
63
|
+
real classes for each kind of response? What are the inputs? Where should
|
64
|
+
api key go, to global param?); or
|
65
|
+
2. Just "go commando" (sorry for the bad pun): construct URLs yourself,
|
66
|
+
parse responses yourself, control params (or ignore the control) yourself.
|
67
|
+
|
68
|
+
TLAW tries to close this gap: provide a base for _breath-easy_ API description
|
69
|
+
which produces solid, fast and reliable wrappers.
|
70
|
+
|
71
|
+
## Usage
|
72
|
+
|
73
|
+
### URLs and params description
|
74
|
+
|
75
|
+
```ruby
|
76
|
+
class Example < TLAW::API
|
77
|
+
base 'http://api.example.com'
|
78
|
+
|
79
|
+
param :api_key, required: true # this would be necessary for API instance creation
|
80
|
+
# So, the API instance would be e = Example.new(api_key: '123')
|
81
|
+
# ...and parameter ?api_key=123 would be added to any request
|
82
|
+
|
83
|
+
endpoint :foo # The simplest endpoint, will query "http://api.example.com/foo"
|
84
|
+
# And then you just do e.foo and obtain result
|
85
|
+
|
86
|
+
endpoint :bar, '/baz.json' # Path to query rewritten, will query "http://api.example.com/baz.json"
|
87
|
+
# Method is still e.bar, though.
|
88
|
+
|
89
|
+
# Now, for params definition:
|
90
|
+
endpont :movie do
|
91
|
+
param :id
|
92
|
+
end
|
93
|
+
# Method call would be movie(id: '123')
|
94
|
+
# Generated URL would be "http://api.example.com/movie?id=123"
|
95
|
+
|
96
|
+
# When param is part of the path, you can use RFC 6570
|
97
|
+
# URL template standard:
|
98
|
+
endpoint :movie, '/movies/{id}'
|
99
|
+
# That would generate method which is called like movie('123')
|
100
|
+
# ...and call to "http://api.example.com/movies/123"
|
101
|
+
|
102
|
+
# Now, we can stack endpoints in namespaces
|
103
|
+
namespace :foo do # adds /foo to path
|
104
|
+
namespace :bar, '/baz' do # optional path parameter works
|
105
|
+
endpoint :blah # URL for call would be "http://api.example.com/foo/baz/blah"
|
106
|
+
# And method call would be like e.foo.bar.blah(parameters)
|
107
|
+
end
|
108
|
+
|
109
|
+
# URL normalization works, so you can stack in namespaces even
|
110
|
+
# things not related to them in source API, "redesigning" API on
|
111
|
+
# the fly.
|
112
|
+
endpoint :books, '/../books.json' # Real URL would be "http://api.example.com/books"
|
113
|
+
# Yet method call is still namespaced like e.foo.books
|
114
|
+
end
|
115
|
+
|
116
|
+
# Namespaces can have their own input parameters
|
117
|
+
namespace :foo, '/foo/{id}' do
|
118
|
+
endpoint :bar # URL would be "http://api.example.com/foo/123/bar
|
119
|
+
# method call would be e.foo(123).bar
|
120
|
+
end
|
121
|
+
|
122
|
+
# ...and everything works in all possible and useful ways, just check
|
123
|
+
# docs and demos.
|
124
|
+
end
|
125
|
+
```
|
126
|
+
|
127
|
+
See [DSL module docs](http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/tlaw/TLAW/DSL) for
|
128
|
+
full description of all features (there are few, yet very powerful).
|
129
|
+
|
130
|
+
### Response processing
|
131
|
+
|
132
|
+
TLAW is really opinionated about response processing. Main things:
|
133
|
+
|
134
|
+
1. [Hashes are "flattened"](#flat-hashes);
|
135
|
+
2. [Arrays of hashes are converted to `DataTable`s](#datatable);
|
136
|
+
3. [Post-processors for fields are easily defined](#post-processing)
|
137
|
+
|
138
|
+
#### Flat hashes
|
139
|
+
|
140
|
+
The main (and usually top-level) answer of (JSON) API is a Hash/dictionary.
|
141
|
+
TLAW takes all multilevel hashes and make them flat.
|
142
|
+
|
143
|
+
Here is an example.
|
144
|
+
|
145
|
+
Source API responds like:
|
146
|
+
|
147
|
+
```json
|
148
|
+
{
|
149
|
+
"meta": {
|
150
|
+
"code": "OK",
|
151
|
+
},
|
152
|
+
"weahter": {
|
153
|
+
"temp": 10,
|
154
|
+
"precipation": 138
|
155
|
+
},
|
156
|
+
"location": {
|
157
|
+
"lat": 123,
|
158
|
+
"lon": 456
|
159
|
+
}
|
160
|
+
...
|
161
|
+
}
|
162
|
+
```
|
163
|
+
|
164
|
+
But TLAW response to `api.endpoint(params)` would return you a Hash looking
|
165
|
+
this way:
|
166
|
+
|
167
|
+
```json
|
168
|
+
{
|
169
|
+
"meta.code": "OK",
|
170
|
+
"weahter.temp": 10,
|
171
|
+
"weahter.precipation": 138,
|
172
|
+
"location.lat": 123,
|
173
|
+
"location.lon": 456
|
174
|
+
...
|
175
|
+
}
|
176
|
+
```
|
177
|
+
|
178
|
+
Reason? If you think of it and experiment with several examples, typically
|
179
|
+
with new & unexplored API you'll came up with code like:
|
180
|
+
|
181
|
+
```ruby
|
182
|
+
p response
|
183
|
+
# => 3 screens of VERY IMPORTANT RESPONSE
|
184
|
+
p response.class
|
185
|
+
# => Hash, ah, ok
|
186
|
+
p response.keys
|
187
|
+
# => ["meta", "weather", "location"], hmmm...
|
188
|
+
p response['weather']
|
189
|
+
# => stil 2.5 screens of unintelligible details
|
190
|
+
p response['weather'].class
|
191
|
+
# => Hash, ah!
|
192
|
+
p response['weather'].keys
|
193
|
+
# => and ad infinitum, real APIs are easily go 6-8 levels down
|
194
|
+
```
|
195
|
+
|
196
|
+
Now, with "opinionated" TLAW's flattening, for _any_ API you just do
|
197
|
+
the one and final `response.keys` and that's it: you see every available
|
198
|
+
data key, deep to the deepest depth.
|
199
|
+
|
200
|
+
> NB: probably, in the next versions TLAW will return some Hash descendant,
|
201
|
+
which would also still allow you to do `response['weather']` and receive
|
202
|
+
that "slice". Or it would not :) We are experimenting!
|
203
|
+
|
204
|
+
#### DataTable
|
205
|
+
|
206
|
+
The second main type of a (JSON) API answer, or of a part of an answer
|
207
|
+
is an array of homogenous hashes, like:
|
208
|
+
|
209
|
+
* list of data points (date - weather at that date);
|
210
|
+
* list of data objects (city id - city name - latitude - longitude);
|
211
|
+
* list of views to the data (climate model - projected temperature);
|
212
|
+
* and so on.
|
213
|
+
|
214
|
+
TLAW wraps this kind of data (array of homogenous hashes, or tables with
|
215
|
+
named columns) into `DataTable` structure, which you can think of as an
|
216
|
+
Excel spreadsheet (2d array with named columns), or loose DataFrame
|
217
|
+
pattern implementation (just like [daru](https://github.com/v0dro/daru)
|
218
|
+
or [pandas](http://pandas.pydata.org/), but seriously simpler—and much
|
219
|
+
more suited to the case).
|
220
|
+
|
221
|
+
Imagine you have an API responding something like:
|
222
|
+
|
223
|
+
```json
|
224
|
+
{
|
225
|
+
"meta": {"count": 20},
|
226
|
+
"data": [
|
227
|
+
{"date": "2016-09-01", "temp": 20, "humidity": 40},
|
228
|
+
{"date": "2016-09-02", "temp": 21, "humidity": 40},
|
229
|
+
{"date": "2016-09-03", "temp": 16, "humidity": 36},
|
230
|
+
...
|
231
|
+
]
|
232
|
+
}
|
233
|
+
```
|
234
|
+
|
235
|
+
With TLAW, you'll see this response this way:
|
236
|
+
|
237
|
+
```ruby
|
238
|
+
pp response
|
239
|
+
{"meta.count"=>20,
|
240
|
+
"data"=>#<TLAW::DataTable[date, temp, humidity] x 20>}
|
241
|
+
# ^ That's all. Small and easy to grasp what is what. 3 named columns,
|
242
|
+
# 20 similar rows.
|
243
|
+
|
244
|
+
d = response['data']
|
245
|
+
# => #<TLAW::DataTable[date, temp, humidity] x 20>
|
246
|
+
|
247
|
+
d.count # Array-alike
|
248
|
+
# => 20
|
249
|
+
d.first
|
250
|
+
# => {"date" => "2016-09-01", "temp" => 20, "humidity" => 40}
|
251
|
+
|
252
|
+
d.keys # Hash-alike
|
253
|
+
# => ["date", "temp", "humidity"]
|
254
|
+
d["date"]
|
255
|
+
# => ["2016-09-01", "2016-09-02", "2016-09-03" ...
|
256
|
+
|
257
|
+
# And stuff:
|
258
|
+
d.to_h
|
259
|
+
# => {"date" => [...], "temp" => [...] ....
|
260
|
+
d.to_a
|
261
|
+
# => [{"date" => ..., "temp" => ..., "humidity" => ...}, {"date" => ...
|
262
|
+
|
263
|
+
d.columns('date', 'temp') # column-wise slice
|
264
|
+
# => #<TLAW::DataTable[date, temp] x 20>
|
265
|
+
d.columns('date', 'temp').first # and so on
|
266
|
+
# => {"date" => "2016-09-01", "temp" => 20}
|
267
|
+
```
|
268
|
+
|
269
|
+
Take a look at [DataTable docs](http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/tlaw/TLAW/DataTable)
|
270
|
+
and join designing it!
|
271
|
+
|
272
|
+
#### Post-processing
|
273
|
+
|
274
|
+
When you are not happy with result representation, you can post-process
|
275
|
+
them in several ways:
|
276
|
+
|
277
|
+
```ruby
|
278
|
+
# input is entire response, block can mutate it
|
279
|
+
post_process { |hash| hash['foo'] = 'bar' }
|
280
|
+
|
281
|
+
# input is entire response, and response is fully replaced with block's
|
282
|
+
# return value
|
283
|
+
post_process { |hash| hash['foo'] } # Now only "foo"s value will be response
|
284
|
+
|
285
|
+
# input is value of response's key "some_key", return value of a block
|
286
|
+
# becames new value of "some_key".
|
287
|
+
post_process('some_key') { |val| other_val }
|
288
|
+
|
289
|
+
# Post-processing each item, if response['foo'] is array:
|
290
|
+
post_process_items('foo') {
|
291
|
+
# mutate entire item
|
292
|
+
post_process { |item| item.delete('bar') }
|
293
|
+
|
294
|
+
# if item is a Hash, replace its "bar" value
|
295
|
+
post_process('bar') { |val| val.to_s }
|
296
|
+
}
|
297
|
+
|
298
|
+
# More realistic examples:
|
299
|
+
post_process('meta.count', &:to_i)
|
300
|
+
post_process('daily') {
|
301
|
+
post_process('date', &Date.method(:parse))
|
302
|
+
}
|
303
|
+
post_process('auxiliary_value') { nil } # Nil's will be thrown away completely
|
304
|
+
```
|
305
|
+
|
306
|
+
See full post-processing features descriptions in
|
307
|
+
[DSL module docs](http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/tlaw/TLAW/DSL).
|
308
|
+
|
309
|
+
#### All at once
|
310
|
+
|
311
|
+
All described response processing steps are performed in this order:
|
312
|
+
* parsing and initial flattening of JSON (or XML) hash;
|
313
|
+
* applying post-processors (and flatten the response after _each_ of
|
314
|
+
them);
|
315
|
+
* make `DataTable`s from arrays of hashes.
|
316
|
+
|
317
|
+
### Documentability
|
318
|
+
|
319
|
+
You do it this way:
|
320
|
+
|
321
|
+
```ruby
|
322
|
+
class MyAPI < TLAW::API
|
323
|
+
desc %Q{
|
324
|
+
This is API, it works.
|
325
|
+
}
|
326
|
+
|
327
|
+
docs 'http://docs.example.com'
|
328
|
+
|
329
|
+
namespace :ns do
|
330
|
+
desc %Q{
|
331
|
+
It is some interesting thing.
|
332
|
+
}
|
333
|
+
|
334
|
+
docs 'http://docs.example.com/ns'
|
335
|
+
|
336
|
+
endpoint :baz do
|
337
|
+
desc %Q{
|
338
|
+
Should be useful.
|
339
|
+
}
|
340
|
+
|
341
|
+
docs 'http://docs.example.com/ns#baz'
|
342
|
+
|
343
|
+
param :param1,
|
344
|
+
desc: %Q{
|
345
|
+
You don't need it, really.
|
346
|
+
}
|
347
|
+
end
|
348
|
+
end
|
349
|
+
end
|
350
|
+
```
|
351
|
+
|
352
|
+
All of above is optional, but when provided, allows to investigate
|
353
|
+
things at runtime (in IRB/pry or test scripts). Again, look at
|
354
|
+
[OpenWeatherMap demo](https://github.com/molybdenum-99/tlaw/blob/master/examples/open_weather_map_demo.rb),
|
355
|
+
it shows how docs could be useful at runtime.
|
356
|
+
|
357
|
+
## Some demos
|
358
|
+
|
359
|
+
* Full-featured API wrappers:
|
360
|
+
* OpenWeatherMap: [source API docs](http://openweathermap.org/api),
|
361
|
+
[wrapper](https://github.com/molybdenum-99/tlaw/blob/master/examples/open_weather_map.rb),
|
362
|
+
extensively commented & explained
|
363
|
+
[demo code](https://github.com/molybdenum-99/tlaw/blob/master/examples/open_weather_map_demo.rb);
|
364
|
+
* ForecastIO: [API docs](https://developer.forecast.io/docs/v2),
|
365
|
+
[wrapper](https://github.com/molybdenum-99/tlaw/blob/master/examples/forecast_io.rb),
|
366
|
+
[demo code](https://github.com/molybdenum-99/tlaw/blob/master/examples/forecast_io_demo.rb);
|
367
|
+
* Demos of "fire-and-forget" wrappers:
|
368
|
+
* Urbandictionary's small and unofficial
|
369
|
+
[API wrapper](https://github.com/molybdenum-99/tlaw/blob/master/examples/urbandictionary_demo.rb);
|
370
|
+
* [Partial wrapper](https://github.com/molybdenum-99/tlaw/blob/master/examples/tmdb_demo.rb)
|
371
|
+
only for some features of large [TMDB API](docs.themoviedb.apiary.io/).
|
372
|
+
It also shows [on-the-fly updating](https://github.com/molybdenum-99/tlaw/blob/master/examples/tmdb_demo.rb#L85)
|
373
|
+
of already existing API wrapper to add some features.
|
374
|
+
|
375
|
+
## Installation & compatibility
|
376
|
+
|
377
|
+
Just `gem install tlaw` or add it to your `Gemfile`, nothing fancy.
|
378
|
+
|
379
|
+
Required Ruby version is 2.1+, JRuby works, Rubinius seems like not.
|
380
|
+
|
381
|
+
## Upcoming features
|
382
|
+
|
383
|
+
_(in no particular order)_
|
384
|
+
|
385
|
+
* [ ] Expose Faraday options (backends, request headers);
|
386
|
+
* [ ] Request-headers based auth;
|
387
|
+
* [ ] Responses caching;
|
388
|
+
* [ ] Response headers processing DSL;
|
389
|
+
* [ ] Paging support;
|
390
|
+
* [ ] Frequency-limited API support (requests counting);
|
391
|
+
* [ ] YARD docs generation for resulting wrappers;
|
392
|
+
* [ ] More solid wrapper demos (weather sites, geonames, worldbank);
|
393
|
+
* [ ] Approaches to testing generated wrappers (just good ol' VCR should
|
394
|
+
work, probably);
|
395
|
+
* [ ] Splat parameters.
|
396
|
+
|
397
|
+
## Get-only API
|
398
|
+
|
399
|
+
What is those "Get-only APIs" TLAW is suited for?
|
400
|
+
|
401
|
+
* It is only for _getting_ data, not changing them (though, API may use
|
402
|
+
HTTP POST requests in reality—for example, to transfer large request
|
403
|
+
objects);
|
404
|
+
* It would be cool if our weather APIs could allow things like
|
405
|
+
`POST /weather/kharkiv {sky: 'sunny', temp: '+21°C'}` in the middle
|
406
|
+
of December, huh? But we are not leaving in the world like this.
|
407
|
+
For now.
|
408
|
+
* It has utterly simple authentication protocol like "give us `api_key`
|
409
|
+
param in query" (though, TLAW plans to support more complex authentication);
|
410
|
+
* It typically returns JSON answers (though, TLAW supports XML via
|
411
|
+
awesome [crack](https://github.com/jnunemaker/crack)).
|
412
|
+
|
413
|
+
Alongside already mentioned examples (weather and so on), you can build
|
414
|
+
TLAW-backed "get-only" wrappers for bigger APIs (like Twitter), when
|
415
|
+
"gathering twits" is all you need. (Though, to be honest, TLAW's current
|
416
|
+
authorization abilities is far simpler than
|
417
|
+
[Twitter requirements](https://dev.twitter.com/oauth/application-only)).
|
418
|
+
|
419
|
+
## Current status
|
420
|
+
|
421
|
+
It is version 0.0.1. It is tested and documented, but not "tested in
|
422
|
+
battle", just invented. DSL is subject to be refined and validated,
|
423
|
+
everything could change (or broke suddenly). Tests are lot, though.
|
424
|
+
|
425
|
+
We plan to heavily utilize it for [reality](https://github.com/molybdenum-99/reality),
|
426
|
+
that would be serious evaluation of approaches and weeknesses.
|
427
|
+
|
428
|
+
## Links
|
429
|
+
|
430
|
+
* [API Docs](http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/tlaw)
|
431
|
+
|
432
|
+
## Author
|
433
|
+
|
434
|
+
[Victor Shepelev](http://zverok.github.io/)
|
435
|
+
|
436
|
+
## License
|
437
|
+
|
438
|
+
[MIT](./LICENSE.txt).
|