nitpicker-code-review 1.2 → 1.3.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- checksums.yaml +4 -4
- data/README.md +2 -2
- data/config/prompt +2 -7
- data/lib/nitpicker/version.rb +1 -1
- metadata +2 -2
checksums.yaml
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
SHA256:
|
|
3
|
-
metadata.gz:
|
|
4
|
-
data.tar.gz:
|
|
3
|
+
metadata.gz: 8836943df696729d186a11e22ddf756e868774cca3f5dcc17a279625ceacf2ba
|
|
4
|
+
data.tar.gz: 49c3369b084033ddac9088018e85a9862893b0da4f41a58efd1e5447cbc9f1e9
|
|
5
5
|
SHA512:
|
|
6
|
-
metadata.gz:
|
|
7
|
-
data.tar.gz:
|
|
6
|
+
metadata.gz: 265b346691aeb986b17aaed676261a39658b30a0a9d56c0cfdb9b5f5b7cdc7caed2637398b47c41155cec415934607d1764493533c423f501fa25bfeadf2ca53
|
|
7
|
+
data.tar.gz: 99b770090fe7d393a2105ce5af64351bb330f0b7e310e45eb8f2d25cc154ebdb2271b6c08c818e0ed438890b8dc3b0390c2a72880bb0140e4932fe362a2643ef
|
data/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
# NitPicker
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
NitPicker is a command-line tool that provides AI-powered code reviews for your Git changes. It analyzes your staged changes by default, but can also review any diff piped to it. It offers
|
|
3
|
+
NitPicker is a command-line tool that provides AI-powered code reviews for your Git changes. It analyzes your staged changes by default, but can also review any diff piped to it. It offers scathing and mercilessly critical feedback to help improve code quality, security, performance, and maintainability by making you feel like an idiot.
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
5
|
## Features
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
@@ -229,4 +229,4 @@ The test suite includes:
|
|
|
229
229
|
|
|
230
230
|
## Author
|
|
231
231
|
|
|
232
|
-
Justin Bishop (jubishop)
|
|
232
|
+
Justin Bishop (jubishop)
|
data/config/prompt
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ You are an expert software engineer conducting a thorough code review.
|
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
3
|
IMPORTANT: Do NOT reproduce, echo, or reformat the code. Your job is to ANALYZE and provide FEEDBACK only. Do NOT simply summarize what was done.
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
|
-
Analyze the following git diff and provide
|
|
5
|
+
Analyze the following git diff and provide merciless, scathing, critical feedback focusing on:
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
7
|
**Code Quality & Best Practices:**
|
|
8
8
|
- Code readability, maintainability, and organization
|
|
@@ -32,12 +32,7 @@ Analyze the following git diff and provide constructive feedback focusing on:
|
|
|
32
32
|
- Missing validation or sanitization
|
|
33
33
|
- Hardcoded values that should be configurable
|
|
34
34
|
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
1. Explain the problem clearly
|
|
37
|
-
2. Suggest specific improvements
|
|
38
|
-
3. Explain why the change would be beneficial
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
If the code looks good overall, highlight what was done well and provide any minor suggestions for improvement.
|
|
35
|
+
Focus only on what is bad and how terriby stupid the author of the change must be.
|
|
41
36
|
|
|
42
37
|
Start your response with "## Code Review" and provide analysis in prose, NOT code blocks or diffs.
|
|
43
38
|
|
data/lib/nitpicker/version.rb
CHANGED
metadata
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
--- !ruby/object:Gem::Specification
|
|
2
2
|
name: nitpicker-code-review
|
|
3
3
|
version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version
|
|
4
|
-
version:
|
|
4
|
+
version: 1.3.0
|
|
5
5
|
platform: ruby
|
|
6
6
|
authors:
|
|
7
7
|
- Justin Bishop
|
|
8
8
|
bindir: bin
|
|
9
9
|
cert_chain: []
|
|
10
|
-
date: 2025-
|
|
10
|
+
date: 2025-06-01 00:00:00.000000000 Z
|
|
11
11
|
dependencies:
|
|
12
12
|
- !ruby/object:Gem::Dependency
|
|
13
13
|
name: json
|