nimboids-workflow 0.8.0
Sign up to get free protection for your applications and to get access to all the features.
- data/.gitignore +8 -0
- data/MIT-LICENSE +20 -0
- data/README.markdown +550 -0
- data/Rakefile +44 -0
- data/VERSION +1 -0
- data/lib/workflow.rb +376 -0
- data/test/advanced_hooks_and_validation_test.rb +118 -0
- data/test/couchtiny_example.rb +46 -0
- data/test/main_test.rb +483 -0
- data/test/multiple_workflows_test.rb +84 -0
- data/test/readme_example.rb +37 -0
- data/test/test_helper.rb +39 -0
- data/test/without_active_record_test.rb +54 -0
- data/workflow.rb +1 -0
- metadata +86 -0
data/.gitignore
ADDED
data/MIT-LICENSE
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
|
1
|
+
Copyright (c) 2008-2009 Vodafone
|
2
|
+
Copyright (c) 2007-2008 Ryan Allen, FlashDen Pty Ltd
|
3
|
+
|
4
|
+
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
|
5
|
+
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
|
6
|
+
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
|
7
|
+
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
|
8
|
+
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
|
9
|
+
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
|
10
|
+
|
11
|
+
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
|
12
|
+
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
|
13
|
+
|
14
|
+
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
|
15
|
+
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
|
16
|
+
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
|
17
|
+
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
|
18
|
+
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
|
19
|
+
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
|
20
|
+
THE SOFTWARE.
|
data/README.markdown
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,550 @@
|
|
1
|
+
What is workflow?
|
2
|
+
-----------------
|
3
|
+
|
4
|
+
Workflow is a finite-state-machine-inspired API for modeling and
|
5
|
+
interacting with what we tend to refer to as 'workflow'.
|
6
|
+
|
7
|
+
A lot of business modeling tends to involve workflow-like concepts, and
|
8
|
+
the aim of this library is to make the expression of these concepts as
|
9
|
+
clear as possible, using similar terminology as found in state machine
|
10
|
+
theory.
|
11
|
+
|
12
|
+
So, a workflow has a state. It can only be in one state at a time. When
|
13
|
+
a workflow changes state, we call that a transition. Transitions occur
|
14
|
+
on an event, so events cause transitions to occur. Additionally, when an
|
15
|
+
event fires, other arbitrary code can be executed, we call those actions.
|
16
|
+
So any given state has a bunch of events, any event in a state causes a
|
17
|
+
transition to another state and potentially causes code to be executed
|
18
|
+
(an action). We can hook into states when they are entered, and exited
|
19
|
+
from, and we can cause transitions to fail (guards), and we can hook in
|
20
|
+
to every transition that occurs ever for whatever reason we can come up
|
21
|
+
with.
|
22
|
+
|
23
|
+
Now, all that's a mouthful, but we'll demonstrate the API bit by bit
|
24
|
+
with a real-ish world example.
|
25
|
+
|
26
|
+
Let's say we're modeling article submission from journalists. An article
|
27
|
+
is written, then submitted. When it's submitted, it's awaiting review.
|
28
|
+
Someone reviews the article, and then either accepts or rejects it.
|
29
|
+
Here is the expression of this workflow using the API:
|
30
|
+
|
31
|
+
class Article
|
32
|
+
include Workflow
|
33
|
+
workflow do
|
34
|
+
state :new do
|
35
|
+
event :submit, :transitions_to => :awaiting_review
|
36
|
+
end
|
37
|
+
state :awaiting_review do
|
38
|
+
event :review, :transitions_to => :being_reviewed
|
39
|
+
end
|
40
|
+
state :being_reviewed do
|
41
|
+
event :accept, :transitions_to => :accepted
|
42
|
+
event :reject, :transitions_to => :rejected
|
43
|
+
end
|
44
|
+
state :accepted
|
45
|
+
state :rejected
|
46
|
+
end
|
47
|
+
end
|
48
|
+
|
49
|
+
Nice, isn't it!
|
50
|
+
|
51
|
+
Let's create an article instance and check in which state it is:
|
52
|
+
|
53
|
+
article = Article.new
|
54
|
+
article.accepted? # => false
|
55
|
+
article.new? # => true
|
56
|
+
|
57
|
+
You can also access the whole `current_state` object including the list
|
58
|
+
of possible events and other meta information:
|
59
|
+
|
60
|
+
article.current_state
|
61
|
+
=> #<Workflow::State:0x7f1e3d6731f0 @events={
|
62
|
+
:submit=>#<Workflow::Event:0x7f1e3d6730d8 @action=nil,
|
63
|
+
@transitions_to=:awaiting_review, @name=:submit, @meta={}>},
|
64
|
+
name:new, meta{}
|
65
|
+
|
66
|
+
Now we can call the submit event, which transitions to the
|
67
|
+
<tt>:awaiting_review</tt> state:
|
68
|
+
|
69
|
+
article.submit!
|
70
|
+
article.awaiting_review? # => true
|
71
|
+
|
72
|
+
Events are actually instance methods on a workflow, and depending on the
|
73
|
+
state you're in, you'll have a different set of events used to
|
74
|
+
transition to other states.
|
75
|
+
|
76
|
+
It is also easy to check, if a certain transition is possible from the
|
77
|
+
current state . `article.can_submit?` checks if there is a `:submit`
|
78
|
+
event (transition) defined for the current state.
|
79
|
+
|
80
|
+
|
81
|
+
Installation
|
82
|
+
------------
|
83
|
+
|
84
|
+
gem install workflow
|
85
|
+
|
86
|
+
Alternatively you can just download the lib/workflow.rb and put it in
|
87
|
+
the lib folder of your Rails or Ruby application.
|
88
|
+
|
89
|
+
|
90
|
+
Ruby 1.9
|
91
|
+
--------
|
92
|
+
|
93
|
+
Workflow gem does not work with some (but very widespread) Ruby 1.9
|
94
|
+
builds due to a known bug in Ruby 1.9. Either compile your Ruby 1.9 from
|
95
|
+
source or [comment out some lines in workflow](http://github.com/geekq/workflow/issues#issue/6)
|
96
|
+
(reduces functionality).
|
97
|
+
|
98
|
+
Examples
|
99
|
+
--------
|
100
|
+
|
101
|
+
After installation or downloading of the library you can easily try out
|
102
|
+
all the example code from this README in irb.
|
103
|
+
|
104
|
+
$ irb
|
105
|
+
require 'rubygems'
|
106
|
+
require 'workflow'
|
107
|
+
|
108
|
+
Now just copy and paste the source code from the beginning of this README
|
109
|
+
file snippet by snippet and observe the output.
|
110
|
+
|
111
|
+
|
112
|
+
Transition event handler
|
113
|
+
------------------------
|
114
|
+
|
115
|
+
The best way is to use convention over configuration and to define a
|
116
|
+
method with the same name as the event. Then it is automatically invoked
|
117
|
+
when event is raised. For the Article workflow defined earlier it would
|
118
|
+
be:
|
119
|
+
|
120
|
+
class Article
|
121
|
+
def reject
|
122
|
+
puts 'sending email to the author explaining the reason...'
|
123
|
+
end
|
124
|
+
end
|
125
|
+
|
126
|
+
`article.review!; article.reject!` will cause a state transition, persist the new state
|
127
|
+
(if integrated with ActiveRecord) and invoke this user defined reject
|
128
|
+
method.
|
129
|
+
|
130
|
+
You can also define event handler accepting/requiring additional
|
131
|
+
arguments:
|
132
|
+
|
133
|
+
class Article
|
134
|
+
def review(reviewer = '')
|
135
|
+
puts "[#{reviewer}] is now reviewing the article"
|
136
|
+
end
|
137
|
+
end
|
138
|
+
|
139
|
+
article2 = Article.new
|
140
|
+
article2.submit!
|
141
|
+
article2.review!('Homer Simpson') # => [Homer Simpson] is now reviewing the article
|
142
|
+
|
143
|
+
|
144
|
+
### The old, deprecated way
|
145
|
+
|
146
|
+
The old way, using a block is still supported but deprecated:
|
147
|
+
|
148
|
+
event :review, :transitions_to => :being_reviewed do |reviewer|
|
149
|
+
# store the reviewer
|
150
|
+
end
|
151
|
+
|
152
|
+
We've noticed, that mixing the list of events and states with the blocks
|
153
|
+
invoked for particular transitions leads to a bumpy and poorly readable code
|
154
|
+
due to a deep nesting. We tried (and dismissed) lambdas for this. Eventually
|
155
|
+
we decided to invoke an optional user defined callback method with the same
|
156
|
+
name as the event (convention over configuration) as explained before.
|
157
|
+
|
158
|
+
|
159
|
+
Integration with ActiveRecord
|
160
|
+
-----------------------------
|
161
|
+
|
162
|
+
Workflow library can handle the state persistence fully automatically. You
|
163
|
+
only need to define a string field on the table called `workflow_state`
|
164
|
+
and include the workflow mixin in your model class as usual:
|
165
|
+
|
166
|
+
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
|
167
|
+
include Workflow
|
168
|
+
workflow do
|
169
|
+
# list states and transitions here
|
170
|
+
end
|
171
|
+
end
|
172
|
+
|
173
|
+
On a database record loading all the state check methods e.g.
|
174
|
+
`article.state`, `article.awaiting_review?` are immediately available.
|
175
|
+
For new records or if the workflow_state field is not set the state
|
176
|
+
defaults to the first state declared in the workflow specification. In
|
177
|
+
our example it is `:new`, so `Article.new.new?` returns true and
|
178
|
+
`Article.new.approved?` returns false.
|
179
|
+
|
180
|
+
At the end of a successful state transition like `article.approve!` the
|
181
|
+
new state is immediately saved in the database.
|
182
|
+
|
183
|
+
You can change this behaviour by overriding `persist_workflow_state`
|
184
|
+
method.
|
185
|
+
|
186
|
+
|
187
|
+
### Custom workflow database column
|
188
|
+
|
189
|
+
[meuble](http://imeuble.info/) contributed a solution for using
|
190
|
+
custom persistence column easily, e.g. for a legacy database schema:
|
191
|
+
|
192
|
+
class LegacyOrder < ActiveRecord::Base
|
193
|
+
include Workflow
|
194
|
+
|
195
|
+
workflow_column :foo_bar # use this legacy database column for
|
196
|
+
# persistence
|
197
|
+
end
|
198
|
+
|
199
|
+
|
200
|
+
|
201
|
+
### Single table inheritance
|
202
|
+
|
203
|
+
Single table inheritance is also supported. Descendant classes can either
|
204
|
+
inherit the workflow definition from the parent or override with its own
|
205
|
+
definition.
|
206
|
+
|
207
|
+
Custom workflow state persistence
|
208
|
+
---------------------------------
|
209
|
+
|
210
|
+
If you do not use a relational database and ActiveRecord, you can still
|
211
|
+
integrate the workflow very easily. To implement persistence you just
|
212
|
+
need to override `load_workflow_state` and
|
213
|
+
`persist_workflow_state(new_value)` methods. Next section contains an example for
|
214
|
+
using CouchDB, a document oriented database.
|
215
|
+
|
216
|
+
[Tim Lossen](http://tim.lossen.de/) implemented support
|
217
|
+
for [remodel](http://github.com/tlossen/remodel) / [redis](http://github.com/antirez/redis)
|
218
|
+
key-value store.
|
219
|
+
|
220
|
+
Integration with CouchDB
|
221
|
+
------------------------
|
222
|
+
|
223
|
+
We are using the compact [couchtiny library](http://github.com/geekq/couchtiny)
|
224
|
+
here. But the implementation would look similar for the popular
|
225
|
+
couchrest library.
|
226
|
+
|
227
|
+
require 'couchtiny'
|
228
|
+
require 'couchtiny/document'
|
229
|
+
require 'workflow'
|
230
|
+
|
231
|
+
class User < CouchTiny::Document
|
232
|
+
include Workflow
|
233
|
+
workflow do
|
234
|
+
state :submitted do
|
235
|
+
event :activate_via_link, :transitions_to => :proved_email
|
236
|
+
end
|
237
|
+
state :proved_email
|
238
|
+
end
|
239
|
+
|
240
|
+
def load_workflow_state
|
241
|
+
self[:workflow_state]
|
242
|
+
end
|
243
|
+
|
244
|
+
def persist_workflow_state(new_value)
|
245
|
+
self[:workflow_state] = new_value
|
246
|
+
save!
|
247
|
+
end
|
248
|
+
end
|
249
|
+
|
250
|
+
Please also have a look at
|
251
|
+
[the full source code](http://github.com/geekq/workflow/blob/master/test/couchtiny_example.rb).
|
252
|
+
|
253
|
+
Integration with Mongoid
|
254
|
+
------------------------
|
255
|
+
|
256
|
+
You can integrate with Mongoid following the example above for CouchDB, but there is a gem that does that for you (and includes extensive tests):
|
257
|
+
[workflow_on_mongoid](http://github.com/bowsersenior/workflow_on_mongoid)
|
258
|
+
|
259
|
+
Accessing your workflow specification
|
260
|
+
-------------------------------------
|
261
|
+
|
262
|
+
You can easily reflect on workflow specification programmatically - for
|
263
|
+
the whole class or for the current object. Examples:
|
264
|
+
|
265
|
+
article2.current_state.events # lists possible events from here
|
266
|
+
article2.current_state.events[:reject].transitions_to # => :rejected
|
267
|
+
|
268
|
+
Article.workflow_spec.states.keys
|
269
|
+
#=> [:rejected, :awaiting_review, :being_reviewed, :accepted, :new]
|
270
|
+
|
271
|
+
Article.workflow_spec.state_names
|
272
|
+
#=> [:rejected, :awaiting_review, :being_reviewed, :accepted, :new]
|
273
|
+
|
274
|
+
# list all events for all states
|
275
|
+
Article.workflow_spec.states.values.collect &:events
|
276
|
+
|
277
|
+
|
278
|
+
You can also store and later retrieve additional meta data for every
|
279
|
+
state and every event:
|
280
|
+
|
281
|
+
class MyProcess
|
282
|
+
include Workflow
|
283
|
+
workflow do
|
284
|
+
state :main, :meta => {:importance => 8}
|
285
|
+
state :supplemental, :meta => {:importance => 1}
|
286
|
+
end
|
287
|
+
end
|
288
|
+
puts MyProcess.workflow_spec.states[:supplemental].meta[:importance] # => 1
|
289
|
+
|
290
|
+
The workflow library itself uses this feature to tweak the graphical
|
291
|
+
representation of the workflow. See below.
|
292
|
+
|
293
|
+
|
294
|
+
Advanced transition hooks
|
295
|
+
-------------------------
|
296
|
+
|
297
|
+
### on_entry/on_exit
|
298
|
+
|
299
|
+
We already had a look at the declaring callbacks for particular workflow
|
300
|
+
events. If you would like to react to all transitions to/from the same state
|
301
|
+
in the same way you can use the on_entry/on_exit hooks. You can either define it
|
302
|
+
with a block inside the workflow definition or through naming
|
303
|
+
convention, e.g. for the state :pending just define the method
|
304
|
+
`on_pending_exit(new_state, event, *args)` somewhere in your class.
|
305
|
+
|
306
|
+
### on_transition
|
307
|
+
|
308
|
+
If you want to be informed about everything happening everywhere, e.g. for
|
309
|
+
logging then you can use the universal `on_transition` hook:
|
310
|
+
|
311
|
+
workflow do
|
312
|
+
state :one do
|
313
|
+
event :increment, :transitions_to => :two
|
314
|
+
end
|
315
|
+
state :two
|
316
|
+
on_transition do |from, to, triggering_event, *event_args|
|
317
|
+
Log.info "#{from} -> #{to}"
|
318
|
+
end
|
319
|
+
end
|
320
|
+
|
321
|
+
Please also have a look at the [advanced end to end
|
322
|
+
example][advanced_hooks_and_validation_test].
|
323
|
+
|
324
|
+
[advanced_hooks_and_validation_test]: http://github.com/geekq/workflow/blob/master/test/advanced_hooks_and_validation_test.rb
|
325
|
+
|
326
|
+
### Guards
|
327
|
+
|
328
|
+
If you want to halt the transition conditionally, you can just raise an
|
329
|
+
exception in your [transition event handler](#transition_event_handler).
|
330
|
+
There is a helper called `halt!`, which raises the
|
331
|
+
Workflow::TransitionHalted exception. You can provide an additional
|
332
|
+
`halted_because` parameter.
|
333
|
+
|
334
|
+
def reject(reason)
|
335
|
+
halt! 'We do not reject articles unless the reason is important' \
|
336
|
+
unless reason =~ /important/i
|
337
|
+
end
|
338
|
+
|
339
|
+
The traditional `halt` (without the exclamation mark) is still supported
|
340
|
+
too. This just prevents the state change without raising an
|
341
|
+
exception.
|
342
|
+
|
343
|
+
You can check `halted?` and `halted_because` values later.
|
344
|
+
|
345
|
+
### Hook order
|
346
|
+
|
347
|
+
The whole event sequence is as follows:
|
348
|
+
|
349
|
+
* event specific action
|
350
|
+
* on_transition (if action did not halt)
|
351
|
+
* on_exit
|
352
|
+
* PERSIST WORKFLOW STATE, i.e. transition
|
353
|
+
* on_entry
|
354
|
+
|
355
|
+
|
356
|
+
Multiple Workflows
|
357
|
+
------------------
|
358
|
+
|
359
|
+
I am frequently asked if it's possible to represent multiple "workflows"
|
360
|
+
in an ActiveRecord class.
|
361
|
+
|
362
|
+
The solution depends on your business logic and how you want to
|
363
|
+
structure your implementation.
|
364
|
+
|
365
|
+
### Use Single Table Inheritance
|
366
|
+
|
367
|
+
One solution can be to do it on the class level and use a class
|
368
|
+
hierarchy. You can use [single table inheritance][STI] so there is only
|
369
|
+
single `orders` table in the database. Read more in the chapter "Single
|
370
|
+
Table Inheritance" of the [ActiveRecord documentation][ActiveRecord].
|
371
|
+
Then you define your different classes:
|
372
|
+
|
373
|
+
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
|
374
|
+
include Workflow
|
375
|
+
end
|
376
|
+
|
377
|
+
class SmallOrder < Order
|
378
|
+
workflow do
|
379
|
+
# workflow definition for small orders goes here
|
380
|
+
end
|
381
|
+
end
|
382
|
+
|
383
|
+
class BigOrder < Order
|
384
|
+
workflow do
|
385
|
+
# workflow for big orders, probably with a longer approval chain
|
386
|
+
end
|
387
|
+
end
|
388
|
+
|
389
|
+
|
390
|
+
### Individual workflows for objects
|
391
|
+
|
392
|
+
Another solution would be to connect different workflows to object
|
393
|
+
instances via metaclass, e.g.
|
394
|
+
|
395
|
+
# Load an object from the database
|
396
|
+
booking = Booking.find(1234)
|
397
|
+
|
398
|
+
# Now define a workflow - exclusively for this object,
|
399
|
+
# probably depending on some condition or database field
|
400
|
+
if # some condition
|
401
|
+
class << booking
|
402
|
+
include Workflow
|
403
|
+
workflow do
|
404
|
+
state :state1
|
405
|
+
state :state2
|
406
|
+
end
|
407
|
+
end
|
408
|
+
# if some other condition, use a different workflow
|
409
|
+
|
410
|
+
You can also encapsulate this in a class method or even put in some
|
411
|
+
ActiveRecord callback. Please also have a look at [the full working
|
412
|
+
example][multiple_workflow_test]!
|
413
|
+
|
414
|
+
[STI]: http://www.martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/singleTableInheritance.html
|
415
|
+
[ActiveRecord]: http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Base.html
|
416
|
+
[multiple_workflow_test]: http://github.com/geekq/workflow/blob/master/test/multiple_workflows_test.rb
|
417
|
+
|
418
|
+
|
419
|
+
Documenting with diagrams
|
420
|
+
-------------------------
|
421
|
+
|
422
|
+
You can generate a graphical representation of your workflow for
|
423
|
+
documentation purposes. S. Workflow::create_workflow_diagram.
|
424
|
+
|
425
|
+
|
426
|
+
Earlier versions
|
427
|
+
----------------
|
428
|
+
|
429
|
+
The `workflow` library was originally written by Ryan Allen.
|
430
|
+
|
431
|
+
The version 0.3 was almost completely (including ActiveRecord
|
432
|
+
integration, API for accessing workflow specification,
|
433
|
+
method_missing free implementation) rewritten by Vladimir Dobriakov
|
434
|
+
keeping the original workflow DSL spirit.
|
435
|
+
|
436
|
+
|
437
|
+
Migration from the original Ryan's library
|
438
|
+
------------------------------------------
|
439
|
+
|
440
|
+
Credit: Michael (rockrep)
|
441
|
+
|
442
|
+
Accessing workflow specification
|
443
|
+
|
444
|
+
my_instance.workflow # old
|
445
|
+
MyClass.workflow_spec # new
|
446
|
+
|
447
|
+
Accessing states, events, meta, e.g.
|
448
|
+
|
449
|
+
my_instance.workflow.states(:some_state).events(:some_event).meta[:some_meta_tag] # old
|
450
|
+
MyClass.workflow_spec.states[:some_state].events[:some_event].meta[:some_meta_tag] # new
|
451
|
+
|
452
|
+
Causing state transitions
|
453
|
+
|
454
|
+
my_instance.workflow.my_event # old
|
455
|
+
my_instance.my_event! # new
|
456
|
+
|
457
|
+
when using both a block and a callback method for an event, the block executes prior to the callback
|
458
|
+
|
459
|
+
|
460
|
+
Changelog
|
461
|
+
---------
|
462
|
+
|
463
|
+
### New in the version 0.8.0
|
464
|
+
|
465
|
+
* check if a certain transition possible from the current state with
|
466
|
+
`can_....?`
|
467
|
+
* fix workflow_state persistence for multiple_workflows example
|
468
|
+
|
469
|
+
### New in the version 0.7.0
|
470
|
+
|
471
|
+
* fix issue#10 Workflow::create_workflow_diagram documentation and path
|
472
|
+
escaping
|
473
|
+
* fix issue#7 workflow_column does not work STI (single table
|
474
|
+
inheritance) ActiveRecord models
|
475
|
+
* fix issue#5 Diagram generation fails for models in modules
|
476
|
+
|
477
|
+
### New in the version 0.6.0
|
478
|
+
|
479
|
+
* enable multiple workflows by connecting workflow to object instances
|
480
|
+
(using metaclass) instead of connecting to a class, s. "Multiple
|
481
|
+
Workflows" section
|
482
|
+
|
483
|
+
### New in the version 0.5.0
|
484
|
+
|
485
|
+
* fix issue#3 change the behaviour of halt! to immediately raise an
|
486
|
+
exception. See also http://github.com/geekq/workflow/issues/#issue/3
|
487
|
+
|
488
|
+
### New in the version 0.4.0
|
489
|
+
|
490
|
+
* completely rewritten the documentation to match my branch
|
491
|
+
* switch to [jeweler][] for building gems
|
492
|
+
* use [gemcutter][] for gem distribution
|
493
|
+
* every described feature is backed up by an automated test
|
494
|
+
|
495
|
+
[jeweler]: http://github.com/technicalpickles/jeweler
|
496
|
+
[gemcutter]: http://gemcutter.org/gems/workflow
|
497
|
+
|
498
|
+
### New in the version 0.3.0
|
499
|
+
|
500
|
+
Intermixing of transition graph definition (states, transitions)
|
501
|
+
on the one side and implementation of the actions on the other side
|
502
|
+
for a bigger state machine can introduce clutter.
|
503
|
+
|
504
|
+
To reduce this clutter it is now possible to use state entry- and
|
505
|
+
exit- hooks defined through a naming convention. For example, if there
|
506
|
+
is a state :pending, then instead of using a
|
507
|
+
block:
|
508
|
+
|
509
|
+
state :pending do
|
510
|
+
on_entry do
|
511
|
+
# your implementation here
|
512
|
+
end
|
513
|
+
end
|
514
|
+
|
515
|
+
you can hook in by defining method
|
516
|
+
|
517
|
+
def on_pending_exit(new_state, event, *args)
|
518
|
+
# your implementation here
|
519
|
+
end
|
520
|
+
|
521
|
+
anywhere in your class. You can also use a simpler function signature
|
522
|
+
like `def on_pending_exit(*args)` if your are not interested in
|
523
|
+
arguments. Please note: `def on_pending_exit()` with an empty list
|
524
|
+
would not work.
|
525
|
+
|
526
|
+
If both a function with a name according to naming convention and the
|
527
|
+
on_entry/on_exit block are given, then only on_entry/on_exit block is used.
|
528
|
+
|
529
|
+
|
530
|
+
Support
|
531
|
+
-------
|
532
|
+
|
533
|
+
### Reporting bugs
|
534
|
+
|
535
|
+
<http://github.com/geekq/workflow/issues>
|
536
|
+
|
537
|
+
|
538
|
+
About
|
539
|
+
-----
|
540
|
+
|
541
|
+
Author: Vladimir Dobriakov, <http://www.innoq.com/blog/vd>, <http://blog.geekq.net/>
|
542
|
+
|
543
|
+
Copyright (c) 2008-2009 Vodafone
|
544
|
+
|
545
|
+
Copyright (c) 2007-2008 Ryan Allen, FlashDen Pty Ltd
|
546
|
+
|
547
|
+
Based on the work of Ryan Allen and Scott Barron
|
548
|
+
|
549
|
+
Licensed under MIT license, see the MIT-LICENSE file.
|
550
|
+
|