lodging 0.0.12 → 0.0.13

data/.document

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+README.rdoc
+lib/**/*.rb
+bin/*
+features/**/*.feature
+LICENSE

data/.gitignore

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+## MAC OS
+.DS_Store
+
+## TEXTMATE
+*.tmproj
+tmtags
+
+## EMACS
+*~
+\#*
+.\#*
+
+## VIM
+*.swp
+
+## DOCUMENTATION
+docs
+
+## PROJECT::GENERAL
+coverage
+rdoc
+pkg
+log
+
+## PROJECT::SPECIFIC
+Gemfile.lock

data/Gemfile

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+ENV.each do |name, value|
+  if /^LOCAL_(.+)/.match(name)
+    gem $1.downcase, :path => value
+  end
+end
+
+source :rubygems
+
+gemspec :path => '.'

data/LICENSE-PREAMBLE

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+BRIGHTER PLANET ADDITIONAL PREAMBLE TO THE GNU AFFERO GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
+January 7, 2011
+
+This preamble is meant to help the licensee understand exactly what
+software is being received under the license and set expectations as to
+what is not covered.
+
+IDENTITY OF THE SOFTWARE MODULE COVERED BY LICENSE:
+
+This license covers the Brighter Planet carbon model referred to as
+'Lodging,' officially distributed from
+https://github.com/brighterplanet/lodging.
+
+SCOPE OF THE SOFTWARE MODULE COVERED BY LICENSE:
+
+The scope of the license includes only those files included in the
+official Brighter Planet distribution package for the particular carbon
+model identified above, including only the carbon model execution files,
+reference data classes, input characterization, fallbacks, summarization
+helpers, tests, and test fixtures.
+
+WHAT IS NOT COVERED BY LICENSE:
+
+This license does not extend to the following:
+
+  * Any element of any Brighter Planet website, including but not
+    limited the copyrights, trademarks, graphic design, text,
+    documentation, method of interaction with clients, runtime
+    environment, technical infrastructure, and software code associated
+    therewith;
+
+  * Any element of any Brighter Planet website user interface, including
+    but not limited to the copyrights, trademarks, graphic design, text,
+    documentation, method of interaction with clients, runtime
+    environment, technical infrastructure, and software code associated
+    therewith;
+
+  * Any element of other software modules licensed under any form of
+    license including but not limited to other forms of open source
+    license, commercial license, and the like;
+
+  * Any element of any Brighter Planet Carbon Middleware web service,
+    including but not limited to the copyrights, trademarks, graphic
+    design, text, documentation, method of interaction with clients,
+    runtime environment, technical infrastructure, and software code, is
+    not covered by the license; and
+
+  * Any aspect or use of http://carbon.brighterplanet.com.
+
+If you have any questions, please contact licensing@brighterplanet.com
+
+Copyright 2010, 2011 Brighter Planet, Inc.

data/Rakefile

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+require 'bundler'
+Bundler.setup
+
+require 'sniff'
+require 'sniff/rake_tasks'
+Sniff::RakeTasks.define_tasks do |t|
+  t.earth_domains = [:hospitality, :fuel, :locality]
+end

data/VERSION

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+0.0.12

data/certification_changelog.markdown

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# Material changes
+
+# Immaterial changes
+Duration changed from nights to seconds (2874bea2f413418385409e9fec754b55cdc52e11)
+
+# Latest 3rd-party review
+f2055675984f46286d85619cab496d8266203503
+
+- - -
+
+**Certification only applies if using a certified version of Earth**

data/dot.rvmrc

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+rvm 1.8.7
+project=`basename \`pwd\``
+if rvm gemset list | grep $project
+then
+  rvm 1.8.7@$project
+else
+  rvm gemset create $project
+  rvm gemset use $project
+fi

data/features/lodging_committees.feature

@@ -1,200 +1,385 @@
 Feature: Lodging Committee Calculations
   The lodging model should generate correct committee calculations
 
+  Background:
+    Given a Lodging
+
+  Scenario: Date committee from timeframe
+    Given a characteristic "timeframe" of "2009-06-06/2010-01-01"
+    When the "date" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from timeframe"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "2009-06-06"
+    And the conclusion should comply with standards "ghg_protocol_scope_3, iso"
+
   Scenario: Rooms committee from default
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    When the "rooms" committee is calculated
+    When the "rooms" committee reports
     Then the committee should have used quorum "default"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "1"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "1.0"
 
   Scenario: Duration committee from default
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    When the "duration" committee is calculated
+    When the "duration" committee reports
     Then the committee should have used quorum "default"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "86400"
+
+  Scenario: Room nights committee from default
+    Given a characteristic "timeframe" of "2009-06-06/2010-01-01"
+    When the "date" committee reports
+    And the "rooms" committee reports
+    And the "duration" committee reports
+    And the "room_nights" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from rooms, duration, date, and timeframe"
     And the conclusion of the committee should be "1"
 
+  Scenario Outline: Room nights committee from rooms, duration, date, and timeframe
+    Given characteristic "date" of "<date>"
+    And a characteristic "timeframe" of "<timeframe>"
+    And a characteristic "rooms" of "<rooms>"
+    And a characteristic "duration" of "<duration>"
+    When the "room_nights" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from rooms, duration, date, and timeframe"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "<room_nights>"
+    Examples:
+      | date       | timeframe             | rooms | duration | room_nights |
+      | 2009-01-15 | 2009-01-01/2009-02-01 | 2     | 172800   | 4           |
+      | 2009-02-15 | 2009-01-01/2009-02-01 | 2     | 172800   | 0           |
+
+  # Scenario: Zip code committee from postcode that is zip code
+  #   Given a characteristic "postcode" of "94122"
+  #   When the "zip_code" committee reports
+  #   Then the committee should have used quorum "from postcode"
+  #   And the conclusion of the committee should have "name" of "94122"
+  # 
+  # Scenario: Zip code committee from postcode that is zip+4
+  #   Given a characteristic "postcode" of "94122-1234"
+  #   When the "zip_code" committee reports
+  #   Then the committee should have used quorum "from postcode"
+  #   And the conclusion of the committee should have "name" of "94122"
+  # 
+  # Scenario: Zip code committee from postcode that is not zip code
+  #   Given a characteristic "postcode" of "38000"
+  #   When the "zip_code" committee reports
+  #   Then the conclusion of the committee should be nil
+
+  Scenario: Climate division from zip code
+    Given a characteristic "zip_code.name" of "94122"
+    When the "climate_division" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from zip code"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should have "name" of "CA4"
+
+  Scenario: Climate division from zip code missing climate division
+    Given a characteristic "zip_code.name" of "94133"
+    When the "climate_division" committee reports
+    Then the conclusion of the committee should be nil
+
+  Scenario: City committee from zip code
+    Given a characteristic "zip_code.name" of "94122"
+    When the "city" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from zip code"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "San Francisco"
+
   Scenario: State committee from zip code
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "zip_code.name" of "94122"
-    When the "state" committee is calculated
+    Given a characteristic "zip_code.name" of "94122"
+    When the "state" committee reports
     Then the committee should have used quorum "from zip code"
     And the conclusion of the committee should have "postal_abbreviation" of "CA"
 
-  Scenario: Census division committee from state
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "state.postal_abbreviation" of "CA"
-    When the "census_division" committee is calculated
+  Scenario: Country committee from state
+    Given a characteristic "state.postal_abbreviation" of "CA"
+    When the "country" committee reports
     Then the committee should have used quorum "from state"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should have "number" of "9"
-
-  Scenario: eGRID subregion from nothing
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    When the "egrid_subregion" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "default"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should have "abbreviation" of "US"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should have "iso_3166_code" of "US"
 
   Scenario: eGRID subregion from zip code
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "zip_code.name" of "94122"
-    When the "egrid_subregion" committee is calculated
+    Given a characteristic "zip_code.name" of "94122"
+    When the "egrid_subregion" committee reports
     Then the committee should have used quorum "from zip code"
     And the conclusion of the committee should have "abbreviation" of "CAMX"
 
-  Scenario: eGRID region from nothing
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    When the "egrid_subregion" committee is calculated
-    And the "egrid_region" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from eGRID subregion"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should have "name" of "US"
+  Scenario: Cooling degree days committee from country
+    Given a characteristic "country.iso_3166_code" of "US"
+    When the "cooling_degree_days" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from country"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "880"
 
-  Scenario: eGRID region from zip code
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "zip_code.name" of "94122"
-    When the "egrid_subregion" committee is calculated
-    And the "egrid_region" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from eGRID subregion"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should have "name" of "W"
+  Scenario: Cooling degree days committee from climate division
+    Given a characteristic "climate_division.name" of "CA4"
+    When the "cooling_degree_days" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from climate division"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "150"
 
-  Scenario: Lodging class committee from nothing
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    When the "lodging_class" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "default"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should have "name" of "Average"
-
-  Scenario: District heat intensity committee from nothing
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    When the "lodging_class" committee is calculated
-    And the "district_heat_intensity" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from lodging class"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "10000000"
-
-  Scenario: District heat intensity committee from lodging class
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "lodging_class.name" of "Luxury Hotel"
-    When the "district_heat_intensity" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from lodging class"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "20000000"
-
-  Scenario: District heat intensity committee from census division
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "census_division.number" of "9"
-    When the "district_heat_intensity" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from census division"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "1000"
-
-  Scenario: Electricity intensity committee from nothing
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    When the "lodging_class" committee is calculated
-    And the "electricity_intensity" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from lodging class"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "5"
-
-  Scenario: Electricity intensity committee from lodging class
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "lodging_class.name" of "Luxury Hotel"
-    When the "electricity_intensity" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from lodging class"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "10"
-
-  Scenario: Electricity intensity committee from census division
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "census_division.number" of "9"
-    When the "electricity_intensity" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from census division"
+  Scenario: Heating degree days committee from country
+    Given a characteristic "country.iso_3166_code" of "US"
+    When the "heating_degree_days" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from country"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "2200"
+
+  Scenario: Heating degree days committee from climate division
+    Given a characteristic "climate_division.name" of "CA4"
+    When the "heating_degree_days" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from climate division"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "1350"
+
+  Scenario: Floors
+    Given a characteristic "property.northstar_id" of "1"
+    When the "floors" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from property"
     And the conclusion of the committee should be "3"
 
-  Scenario: Fuel oil intensity committee from nothing
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    When the "lodging_class" committee is calculated
-    And the "fuel_oil_intensity" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from lodging class"
+  Scenario: Construction year
+    Given a characteristic "property.northstar_id" of "1"
+    When the "construction_year" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from property"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "1993"
+
+  Scenario: AC coverage
+    Given a characteristic "property.northstar_id" of "1"
+    When the "ac_coverage" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from property"
     And the conclusion of the committee should be "0.5"
 
-  Scenario: Fuel oil intensity committee from lodging class
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "lodging_class.name" of "Luxury Hotel"
-    When the "fuel_oil_intensity" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from lodging class"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "1"
+  Scenario Outline: Refrigerator coverage
+    Given a characteristic "property.northstar_id" of "<id>"
+    When the "refrigerator_coverage" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from property"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "<coverage>"
+    Examples:
+      | id | coverage |
+      | 1  | 0.6      |
+      | 2  | 0.5      |
+      | 3  | 0.5      |
+      | 4  | 0.6      |
 
-  Scenario: Fuel oil intensity committee from census division
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "census_division.number" of "9"
-    When the "fuel_oil_intensity" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from census division"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "2"
-
-  Scenario: Natural gas intensity committee from nothing
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    When the "lodging_class" committee is calculated
-    And the "natural_gas_intensity" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from lodging class"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "1"
+  Scenario Outline: Hot tubs
+    Given a characteristic "property.hot_tubs" of "<tubs>"
+    When the "hot_tubs" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from property"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "<count>"
+    Examples:
+      | tubs | count |
+      |    0 |     0 |
+      |    1 |     1 |
+      |    6 |     6 |
 
-  Scenario: Natural gas intensity committee from lodging class
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "lodging_class.name" of "Luxury Hotel"
-    When the "natural_gas_intensity" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from lodging class"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "2"
-
-  Scenario: Natural gas intensity committee from census division
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "census_division.number" of "9"
-    When the "natural_gas_intensity" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from census division"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "1"
+  Scenario Outline: Indoor pools
+    Given a characteristic "property.pools_indoor" of "<pools>"
+    When the "indoor_pools" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from property"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "<count>"
+    Examples:
+      | pools | count |
+      |     0 |     0 |
+      |     1 |     1 |
+      |     5 |     5 |
+      |     6 |     5 |
+
+  Scenario Outline: Outdoor pools
+    Given a characteristic "property.pools_outdoor" of "<pools>"
+    When the "outdoor_pools" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from property"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "<count>"
+    Examples:
+      | pools | count |
+      |     0 |     0 |
+      |     1 |     1 |
+      |     5 |     5 |
+      |     6 |     5 |
+
+  Scenario Outline: Occupancy rate
+    Given a characteristic "country.iso_3166_code" of "<country>"
+    When the "occupancy_rate" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "<quorum>"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "<rate>"
+    Examples:
+      | country | quorum       | rate |
+      | US      | from country | 0.6  |
+      | GB      | from country | 0.5  |
+      |         | default      | 0.6  |
+
+  Scenario: Fuel intensities committee from default
+    When the "fuel_intensities" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "default"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "natural_gas" and value "2.0"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "fuel_oil" and value "0.4"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "electricity" and value "33.9"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "district_heat" and value "1.8"
+
+  Scenario Outline: Fuel intensities committee should not run unless both hdd and cdd are present
+    Given a characteristic "<dd_characteristic>" of "500"
+    And a characteristic "occupancy_rate" of "0.6"
+    When the "fuel_intensities" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "default"
+    Examples:
+     | dd_characteristic   |
+     | heating_degree_days |
+     | cooling_degree_days |
+
+  Scenario Outline: Fuel intensities committee from fuzzy weighting
+    Given a characteristic "heating_degree_days" of "<hdd>"
+    And a characteristic "cooling_degree_days" of "<cdd>"
+    And a characteristic "property_rooms" of "<rooms>"
+    And a characteristic "floors" of "<floors>"
+    And a characteristic "construction_year" of "<year>"
+    And a characteristic "ac_coverage" of "<ac>"
+    When the "occupancy_rate" committee reports
+    And the "fuel_intensities" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from degree days, occupancy rate, and user inputs"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "natural_gas" and value "<gas>"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "fuel_oil" and value "<oil>"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "electricity" and value "<elec>"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "district_heat" and value "<steam>"
+    Examples:
+     | hdd   | cdd  | rooms | floors | year | ac  | gas     | oil     | elec     | steam    | notes |
+     |  1350 |  150 |       |        |      |     | 1.10187 | 2.90728 | 31.32292 | 14.80000 | CA hdd/cdd |
+     |  1350 |  150 | 100   |        |      |     | 0.85612 | 2.96930 | 28.21736 | 13.57824 | CA hdd/cdd |
+     |  1350 |  150 |       |   3    |      |     | 0.83468 | 3.04853 | 27.88175 | 13.76680 | CA hdd/cdd |
+     |  1350 |  150 |       |        | 1993 |     | 1.23045 | 0.77795 | 40.53607 |  4.15725 | CA hdd/cdd |
+     |  1350 |  150 |       |        |      | 0.5 | 0.42758 | 1.12817 | 26.43368 |  5.74312 | CA hdd/cdd |
+     |  1350 |  150 | 100   |   3    | 1993 | 0.5 | 0.08723 | 0.13344 | 25.02442 |  0.76500 | CA hdd/cdd |
+     | 10000 |    0 |       |        |      |     | 0.23482 | 3.52029 | 22.33470 |  1.98967 | extreme hdd |
+     |  2200 |  880 |       |        |      |     | 0.96884 | 0.82078 | 44.47599 |  7.70066 | us hdd/cdd |
+     |  2200 |  880 | 25    |        |      |     | 0.01922 | 0.91159 | 34.86144 |  0.37174 | |
+     |     0 | 4000 |       |        |      |     | 4.33735 | 0.65661 | 60.84568 | 63.33742 | extreme cdd |
+     |  1350 |  150 | 1     |        |      |     | 0.77635 | 3.02573 | 27.72495 | 13.32596 | extreme rooms |
+     |  1350 |  150 | 5000  |        |      |     | 1.82944 | 2.74889 | 38.73677 | 15.59486 | extreme rooms |
+     |  1350 |  150 |       |   1    |      |     | 0.82413 | 3.14038 | 28.48186 | 13.77581 | extreme floors |
+     |  1350 |  150 |       | 100    |      |     | 1.97743 | 2.57705 | 40.83635 | 19.22833 | extreme floors |
+     |  1350 |  150 |       |        | 1200 |     | 0.86163 | 3.04800 | 27.19855 | 13.25471 | extreme year |
+     |  1350 |  150 |       |        | 2012 |     | 1.25202 | 0.65488 | 41.13082 |  4.08640 | extreme year |
+     |  1350 |  150 |       |        |      | 0.0 | 0.06504 | 4.59438 | 17.82449 |  0.87348 | extreme ac |
+     |  1350 |  150 |       |        |      | 1.0 | 2.32907 | 1.29925 | 46.77370 | 31.28316 | extreme ac |
+
+ Scenario Outline: Refrigerator adjustment
+   Given a characteristic "refrigerator_coverage" of "<coverage>"
+   And a characteristic "occupancy_rate" of "0.6"
+   And the "refrigerator_adjustment" committee reports
+   Then the committee should have used quorum "from refrigerator coverage and occupancy rate"
+   And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "electricity" and value "<adjustment>"
+   Examples:
+     | coverage | adjustment |
+     |        0 |   -1.18    |
+     |        1 |    0.78667 |
+
+  Scenario Outline: Hot tub adjustment
+    Given a characteristic "hot_tubs" of "<hot_tubs>"
+    And a characteristic "property_rooms" of "10"
+    And a characteristic "occupancy_rate" of "0.6"
+    When the "hot_tub_adjustment" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from hot tubs, property rooms, and occupancy rate"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "electricity" and value "<adjustment>"
+    Examples:
+      | hot_tubs | adjustment |
+      |        0 |     -0.315 |
+      |        1 |      0.735 |
 
-  Scenario: Emission factor committee from nothing
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    When the "egrid_subregion" committee is calculated
-    And the "egrid_region" committee is calculated
-    And the "lodging_class" committee is calculated
-    And the "district_heat_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "electricity_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "fuel_oil_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "natural_gas_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "emission_factor" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from fuel intensities and eGRID"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "13.74496"
-
-  Scenario: Emission factor committee from lodging class
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "lodging_class.name" of "Luxury Hotel"
-    When the "egrid_subregion" committee is calculated
-    And the "egrid_region" committee is calculated
-    And the "district_heat_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "electricity_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "fuel_oil_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "natural_gas_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "emission_factor" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from fuel intensities and eGRID"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "27.48991"
-
-  Scenario: Emission factor committee from census division
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "census_division.number" of "9"
-    When the "egrid_subregion" committee is calculated
-    And the "egrid_region" committee is calculated
-    And the "district_heat_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "electricity_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "fuel_oil_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "natural_gas_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "emission_factor" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from fuel intensities and eGRID"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "10.00002"
-
-  Scenario: Emission factor committee from zip code
-    Given a lodging emitter
-    And a characteristic "zip_code.name" of "94122"
-    When the "state" committee is calculated
-    And the "census_division" committee is calculated
-    And the "egrid_subregion" committee is calculated
-    And the "egrid_region" committee is calculated
-    And the "district_heat_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "electricity_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "fuel_oil_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "natural_gas_intensity" committee is calculated
-    And the "emission_factor" committee is calculated
-    Then the committee should have used quorum "from fuel intensities and eGRID"
-    And the conclusion of the committee should be "5.83336"
+  Scenario Outline: Indoor pool adjustment
+    Given a characteristic "indoor_pools" of "<pools>"
+    And a characteristic "property_rooms" of "10"
+    And a characteristic "occupancy_rate" of "0.6"
+    When the "indoor_pool_adjustment" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from indoor pools, property rooms, and occupancy rate"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "pool_energy" and value "<adjustment>"
+    Examples:
+      | pools | adjustment |
+      |     0 | -146.17493 |
+      |     1 |  341.07483 |
+      |     5 | 2290.07388 |
+
+  Scenario Outline: Outdoor pool adjustment
+    Given a characteristic "outdoor_pools" of "<pools>"
+    And a characteristic "property_rooms" of "10"
+    And a characteristic "occupancy_rate" of "0.6"
+    When the "outdoor_pool_adjustment" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from outdoor pools, property rooms, and occupancy rate"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "pool_energy" and value "<adjustment>"
+    Examples:
+      | pools | adjustment |
+      |     0 |  -34.80809 |
+      |     1 |   23.20539 |
+      |     5 |  255.25930 |
+
+  Scenario Outline: Adjusted fuel intensities committee from fuel intensities, pool adjustment, and refrigerator adjustment
+    Given a characteristic "heating_degree_days" of "2200"
+    And a characteristic "cooling_degree_days" of "880"
+    And a characteristic "property_rooms" of "25"
+    And a characteristic "occupancy_rate" of "0.6"
+    And a characteristic "refrigerator_coverage" of "<refrigerators>"
+    And a characteristic "hot_tubs" of "<tubs>"
+    And a characteristic "indoor_pools" of "<indoor_pools>"
+    And a characteristic "outdoor_pools" of "<outdoor_pools>"
+    When the "fuel_intensities" committee reports
+    And the "refrigerator_adjustment" committee reports
+    And the "hot_tub_adjustment" committee reports
+    And the "indoor_pool_adjustment" committee reports
+    And the "outdoor_pool_adjustment" committee reports
+    And the "adjusted_fuel_intensities" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from fuel intensities and amenity adjustments"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "natural_gas" and value "<gas>"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "fuel_oil" and value "<oil>"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "electricity" and value "<elec>"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should include a key of "district_heat" and value "<steam>"
+    Examples:
+     | refrigerators | tubs | indoor_pools | outdoor_pools | gas     | oil     | elec     | steam   |
+     |               |      |              |               | 0.01922 | 0.91159 | 34.86144 | 0.37174 |
+     |            0  |      |              |               | 0.01922 | 0.91159 | 33.68144 | 0.37174 |
+     |            1  |      |              |               | 0.01922 | 0.91159 | 35.64811 | 0.37174 |
+     |               |    0 |              |               | 0.01922 | 0.91159 | 34.73544 | 0.37174 |
+     |               |    1 |              |               | 0.01922 | 0.91159 | 35.15544 | 0.37174 |
+     |               |      |            0 |               | 0.0     | 0.0     | 34.86144 | 0.37174 |
+     |               |      |            1 |               | 3.60948 | 0.91159 | 34.86144 | 0.37174 |
+     |               |      |              |             0 | 0.0     | 0.59747 | 34.86144 | 0.37174 |
+     |               |      |              |             1 | 0.26349 | 0.91159 | 34.86144 | 0.37174 |
+
+  Scenario: District heat use committee
+    Given a characteristic "room_nights" of "4"
+    When the "fuel_intensities" committee reports
+    And the "adjusted_fuel_intensities" committee reports
+    And the "district_heat_use" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from adjusted fuel intensities and room nights"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "7.2"
+    
+  Scenario: Electricity use committee
+    Given a characteristic "room_nights" of "4"
+    When the "fuel_intensities" committee reports
+    And the "adjusted_fuel_intensities" committee reports
+    And the "electricity_use" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from adjusted fuel intensities and room nights"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "135.6"
+    
+  Scenario: Fuel oil use committee
+    Given a characteristic "room_nights" of "4"
+    When the "fuel_intensities" committee reports
+    And the "adjusted_fuel_intensities" committee reports
+    And the "fuel_oil_use" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from adjusted fuel intensities and room nights"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "1.6"
+    
+  Scenario: Natural gas use committee
+    Given a characteristic "room_nights" of "4"
+    When the "fuel_intensities" committee reports
+    And the "adjusted_fuel_intensities" committee reports
+    And the "natural_gas_use" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from adjusted fuel intensities and room nights"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "8.0"
+
+  Scenario: Electricity emission factor committee from default
+    When the "electricity_emission_factor" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "default"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "0.69258"
+
+  Scenario: Electricity emission factor committee from country missing emission factor
+    Given a characteristic "country.iso_3166_code" of "VI"
+    When the "electricity_emission_factor" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "default"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "0.69258"
+
+  Scenario: Electricity emission factor committee from country with emission factor
+    Given a characteristic "country.iso_3166_code" of "US"
+    When the "electricity_emission_factor" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from country"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "0.62783"
+
+  Scenario: Electricity emission factor committee from eGRID subregion
+    Given a characteristic "egrid_subregion.abbreviation" of "CAMX"
+    When the "electricity_emission_factor" committee reports
+    Then the committee should have used quorum "from eGRID subregion"
+    And the conclusion of the committee should be "0.32632"