kuality-coeus 0.0.5 → 0.0.6

checksums.yaml

@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
 ---
 !binary "U0hBMQ==":
   metadata.gz: !binary |-
-    NzNjNDI3MmRjZjFkNDc3MjNhNmNkOTFmYWE1MjdjNTM2MGZkNDA5ZA==
+    MmI0OGVlNGE1YzE0MDJiYzFkMjBjMzBhZWE5NmIwMDExNGIxNjRlYg==
   data.tar.gz: !binary |-
-    ZDlhYzIzYjllYTc1ZWI2MTcwYTBhNzZjZGNkOTgzMmM1OWRiYWRmOA==
+    YmVhZTk2Y2M3YjI4MmU4MGJjZDQ5MzJlZTQ4ZTcwMzNiMDI5MTQ5Mw==
 !binary "U0hBNTEy":
   metadata.gz: !binary |-
-    YjBhZjM5NzRhMTJlNDlhYWEzMTVjNWIwOTExOTU2MjJlMTgxMGNiNDk5MGMw
-    NzYwYjExZjcxZTlkNjQ2OTQzODkxMjQ4YTkyNGZiOTNkZDA4MGJhNjY5OGYx
-    ZmVlZDY5MjVlMjVjMjAyM2NlZGRjM2UxOTI4NjY0YmJkZjk1ZjA=
+    MDc2OTIxMTQwODBlYmE0ODUxNTkyOGYxMjRmOWJhOTIzODFhOWRjMmViMmQx
+    NTk5MjgzNmM0N2EwZjdmOWRkMWExMTc3MjM0MzVkZWU5YmU3MmQ1Mjg3NjE1
+    ZTg5NWZmOTVlNTIwZWIwNmNhMmJjZGM5NWE4YmE4NzUxMTUxYzc=
   data.tar.gz: !binary |-
-    NWE0MDkxODJmNzgxODNiN2VjOTA0MGE2OWQ4YzIzOWMyODRlMTJiOWQ5YTFj
-    YjYyMzAwYTM2NjUwZTg0NTU2NDQxMGJiZmE5YTY4NWE4NmM5ZjI4NGJmZmJj
-    NzcwNzE3NDQ2YTgyYWIxMzY3NWY1NzRiMzA0ZjIyMDc0M2Q4Nzc=
+    YTkzNGFmOWE4YjFiNzlkNmRiMGNhYWViMDc5YjkwMTcxYjI3NjA4ZDNkZDJh
+    NDAwOTY2ZjQ5MjEzOWNmYTQ4Y2YxNDIxMjRiMDM3MzUzNDM3MTQ0ODZlODRh
+    ZjNiMTU1OThmZDUxMjBkODUxYjJjYmE0MDBjMzc0M2IzOTA1YzQ=

data/Gemfile

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ source "http://rubygems.org"
 
 gem "rspec"
 gem "cucumber"
-gem "test-factory", ">=0.1.3"
+gem "test-factory", ">=0.3.1"
 gem "watir-webdriver", ">=0.6.4"

data/Gemfile.lock

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ GEM
       multi_json (~> 1.0)
       rubyzip
       websocket (~> 1.0.4)
-    test-factory (0.2.9)
+    test-factory (0.3.1)
       watir-webdriver (>= 0.6.2)
     watir-webdriver (0.6.4)
       selenium-webdriver (>= 2.18.0)
@@ -42,5 +42,5 @@ PLATFORMS
 DEPENDENCIES
   cucumber
   rspec
-  test-factory (>= 0.1.3)
+  test-factory (>= 0.3.1)
   watir-webdriver (>= 0.6.4)

data/features/grants_gov/grants_gov_forms/code_and_form_mapping.feature

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Feature: Opportunity Code and S2S Form Mapping
     Given a user exists with the system role: 'Proposal Creator'
     And   I log in with the Proposal Creator user
     And   initiate a proposal with NIH as the sponsor
-  @test
+
   Scenario Outline: Selecting opportunities brings different forms
     Given I initiate a proposal with NIH as the sponsor
     When  I add the Grants.Gov opportunity id of <Opportunity> to the proposal

data/features/grants_gov/grants_gov_forms/s2s_questionnaire.feature

@@ -1,20 +1,16 @@
 Feature: S2S Questionnaire Population and Functionality
 
-  Background: Logged in with a proposal creator; have other necessary user
+  As a proposal creator, I want to create proposals with the relevant set of
+  questions available to be answered.
+
+  Background: Logged in with a proposal creator; have other necessary users
     Given a user exists with the system role: 'Proposal Creator'
     And   a user exists that can be a PI for Grants.gov proposals
     And   an AOR user exists
     And   I log in with the Proposal Creator user
 
   Scenario: Initiate a proposal with PHS forms attached
-  Given I initiate a proposal with NIH as the sponsor
-  And   add the Grants.Gov opportunity id of PA-B2-ALL to the proposal
-  When  I attach the PHS training and fellowship forms to the proposal
-  Then  the PHS training and fellowship questionnaires should appear in the proposal
-
-  Scenario: Attach the PHS Fellowship and Training forms, and complete the questionnaires
-  Given I initiate a proposal with NIH as the sponsor
-  And   add the Grants.Gov opportunity id of PA-B2-ALL to the proposal
-  When  I attach the PHS training and fellowship forms to the proposal
-  And   complete their respective questionnaires
-  Then  the questionnaire titles should indicate that the questionnaires have been completed
+    Given I initiate a proposal with NIH as the sponsor
+    And   add the Grants.Gov opportunity id of PA-B2-ALL to the proposal
+    When  I attach the PHS training and fellowship forms to the proposal
+    Then  the PHS training and fellowship questionnaires should appear in the proposal

data/features/grants_gov/s2s_submission.feature

@@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ Feature: Submitting Proposals via s2s to Grants.gov
     And   add the <Provider> user as the proposal's PI
     And   set valid credit splits for the proposal
     And   add and mark complete all the required attachments
-    And   create, finalize, and mark complete a budget version for the proposal
+    And   create a final and complete budget version for the proposal
     And   complete the required custom fields on the proposal
     And   answer the S2S questions
     And   submit the proposal
-    And   log in with the AOR user
-    When  I submit the proposal to S2S
+    When  I log in with the AOR user
+    And   submit the proposal to S2S
     Then  the S2S tab's submission details will say the proposal is submitted
     And   within a couple minutes the submission status will be updated
 
@@ -30,4 +30,7 @@ Feature: Submitting Proposals via s2s to Grants.gov
     | Grants.Gov | NIH               | RR-FORMFAMILY-009-2010   |
     | Grants.Gov | DOD-Agency        | CAL-TEST-DOD2            |
     | Grants.Gov | DOD-Agency        | CSS-120809-SF424RR-V12   |
-    | Grants.Gov | NASA - Washington | RR-FORMFAMILY-004-2010   |
+    | Grants.Gov | NASA - Washington | RR-FORMFAMILY-004-2010   |
+
+
+

data/features/grants_gov/s2s_validation.feature

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Feature: Validating content of s2s proposals
 
-  As someone who submits proposals to the federal government for grant money
-  I want to ensure the proposals are free of errors prior to submission
+  As a Proposal creator for federal grant money, I want to ensure my
+  proposals are free of errors, prior to submission
 
   Background: Logged in with a proposal creator; initiate a proposal for grants.gov
     Given a user exists with the system role: 'Proposal Creator'
@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ Feature: Validating content of s2s proposals
   Scenario: Resubmission proposal type selected inappropriately
     Given I set the proposal type to either 'Resubmission', 'Renewal', or 'Continuation'
     When  I activate a validation check
-    Then  one of the validation errors should say that the prior award number is required
+    Then  one of the validation errors should say that the prior award number is required

data/features/proposal_development/create_proposal.feature

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Feature: Creating proposals
+Feature: Creating a proposal development document
 
   As a researcher I want the ability to create a proposal,
   so that I can get funding for my research.
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Feature: Creating proposals
   Background: Logged in with a proposal creator user
     Given a user exists with the system role: 'Proposal Creator'
     And   I log in with the Proposal Creator user
-  @test
+
   Scenario: Attempt to save a proposal missing a required field
     When  I initiate a proposal but miss a required field
     Then  I should see an error that says the field is required
@@ -18,10 +18,3 @@ Feature: Creating proposals
   Scenario: Successful initiation of proposal with federal sponsor type
     When  I initiate a proposal with a 'Federal' sponsor type
     Then  The S2S tab should become available
-
-  Scenario: Successful submission of a Private Profit proposal document into routing
-    When  I complete a valid simple proposal for a 'Private Profit' organization
-    And   submit the proposal
-    Then  The proposal should immediately have a status of 'Approval Pending'
-    And   The proposal route log's 'Actions Taken' should include 'COMPLETED'
-    And   The proposal's 'Future Action Requests' should include 'PENDING APPROVE' for the principal investigator

data/features/proposal_development/key_personnel_validations.feature

@@ -33,10 +33,4 @@ Feature: Key Personnel Validations
 
   Scenario: Error when adding a key person with an invalid unit
     When  I add a key person with an invalid unit type
-    Then  a key personnel error should say to select a valid unit
-
-  Scenario: Error when adding the same user as a PI and Co-Investigator
-    Given a user exists with the system role: 'Unassigned'
-    When  I add the Unassigned user as a Principal Investigator to the key personnel proposal roles
-    And   I add the Unassigned user as a Co-Investigator to the key personnel proposal roles
-    Then  there should be an error that says the Unassigned user already holds investigator role
+    Then  a key personnel error should say to select a valid unit

data/features/proposal_development/proposal_permissions.feature

@@ -46,31 +46,4 @@ Feature: Permissions in a Proposal
     | Narrative Writer |
     | Aggregator       |
     | approver         |
-    | Delete Proposal  |
-
-  Scenario Outline: Users who are assigned the Aggregator role cannot be assigned additional roles
-    Given a user exists with the system role: '<Role>'
-    And   I assign the <Role> user as an aggregator in the proposal permissions
-    When  I attempt to add an additional proposal role to the <Role> user
-    Then  there should be an error message that says not to select other roles alongside aggregator
-
-  Examples:
-    | Role             |
-    | Unassigned       |
-    | Proposal Creator |
-
-  Scenario Outline: Users with the appropriate permissions can edit proposals that have been recalled for revisions
-    Given a user exists with the system role: 'Unassigned'
-    And   assign the Unassigned user as a <Role> in the proposal permissions
-    And   complete the proposal
-    And   submit the proposal
-    When  I recall the proposal
-    Then  the Unassigned user can access the proposal
-    And   their proposal permissions allow them to <Permissions>
-
-  Examples:
-    | Role                | Permissions                                    |
-    | Aggregator          | edit all parts of the proposal                 |
-    | Budget Creator      | only update the budget                         |
-    | Delete Proposal     | delete the proposal                            |
-    | Viewer              | only read the proposal                         |
+    | Delete Proposal  |

data/features/proposal_development/proposal_workflow.feature

@@ -4,9 +4,6 @@ Feature: Proposal Workflows and Routing
   take actions against a proposal that will navigate it through various routes
   in workflow.
 
-#=================
-# Proposal Actions
-#=================
   Scenario Outline: Proposal is successfully routed to PI for action
     Given users exist with the following roles: OSPApprover, Proposal Creator, Unassigned
     And   I log in with the Proposal Creator user
@@ -55,7 +52,7 @@ Feature: Proposal Workflows and Routing
     And   I submit a new development proposal into routing
     When  I blanket approve the proposal
     Then  the proposal status should be Approval Granted
-  @test
+
   Scenario: Aggregator successfully recalls a routed proposal
     Given a user exists with the system role: 'Proposal Creator'
     And   I log in with the Proposal Creator user
@@ -63,9 +60,6 @@ Feature: Proposal Workflows and Routing
     When  I recall the proposal
     Then  the proposal status should be Revisions Requested
 
-#=================
-# Notifications
-#=================
   Scenario: Successful delivery of an FYI from a development proposal
     Given users exist with the following roles: Proposal Creator, OSPApprover
     And   I log in with the Proposal Creator user

data/features/roles/roles.feature

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+Feature: Roles Administration
+
+  As an administrator, I want to be able to set up
+  roles in the system, so that I can control what
+  the system users can do.
+
+  Scenario: Adding an unassigned user to a Group in a Proposal Aggregator Role
+    Given I'm in as the admin
+    And   I create a group
+    And   create an 'unassigned' user
+    And   create a role with permission to create proposals
+    And   add the group to the role
+    When  I add the user to the group
+    Then  the user should be able to create a proposal

data/features/step_definitions/awards/create_award.rb

@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
 When /^I? ?create an award for the institutional_proposal$/ do
   @award = create AwardObject, funding_proposal: @institutional_proposal.proposal_number
+end
+
+When /^I? ?initiate an award document$/ do
+  @award = create AwardObject
+end
+
+When /^I ? ?initiate an award document with a missing required field$/ do
+  @required_field = ['Description', 'Transaction Type', 'Award Status', 'Award Title',
+                     'Activity Type', 'Award Type', 'Project Start Date', 'Project End Date',
+                     'Lead Unit', 'Obligation Start Date', 'Obligation End Date',
+                     'Anticipated Amount', 'Obligated Amount', 'Transactions'
+  ].sample
+  @required_field=~/Type/ ? value='select' : value=''
+  field = snake_case(@required_field)
+  @proposal = create AwardObject, field=>value
 end

data/features/step_definitions/budget_versions/budget_versions.rb

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ When /^correcting the Budget Version date will remove the warning$/ do
   on(Parameters).warnings.size.should be 0
 end
 
-Given /^I? ?create, finalize, and mark complete a budget version for the proposal$/ do
+Given /^I? ?create a final and complete budget version for the proposal$/ do
   @proposal.add_budget_version status: 'Complete', final: :set
 end
 
@@ -100,3 +100,10 @@ end
 Then /^I see an error that only one version can be final$/ do
   on(BudgetVersions).errors.should include 'Only one Budget Version can be marked "Final".'
 end
+
+When /^I? ?create a budget version with cost sharing for the proposal$/ do
+  @proposal.add_budget_version
+  @budget_version = @proposal.budget_versions[0]
+  @budget_version.edit_period(1, cost_sharing: random_dollar_value(1000000).to_f)
+  @budget_version.budget_periods.period(1).cost_sharing_distribution_list[0].edit source_account: random_alphanums
+end

data/features/step_definitions/grants_gov/s2s_submission.rb

@@ -12,14 +12,14 @@ end
 Then /^within a couple minutes the submission status will be updated$/ do
   on S2S do |page|
     x = 0
-    while page.submission_status=='Submitted to S2S'
+    while page.s2s_submission_status=='Submitted to S2S'
       sleep 5
       page.refresh_submission_details
       x += 1
       break if x == 24
     end
     # We don't care what it is. Only that it's updated...
-    page.submission_status.should_not == 'Submitted to S2S'
+    page.s2s_submission_status.should_not == 'Submitted to S2S'
   end
 end
 

data/features/step_definitions/groups.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+When /^I? ?create a group$/ do
+  @group = create GroupObject
+end
+
+When /^I? ?add the user to the group$/ do
+  # Note that this step is assuming you're adding the user that was
+  # last created in the scenario...
+  @group.add_assignee member_identifier: $users[-1].principal_id
+end
+
+Given /^I? ?add the group to the user$/ do
+  $users[-1].add_group id: @group.id
+end

data/features/step_definitions/maintenance.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+Given /^the Budget Column's '(.*)' has a lookup for '(.*)' that returns '(.*)'$/ do |name, look, ret|
+  create BudgetColumnObject, name: name, lookup_argument: look, lookup_return: ret
+end
+
+Given /^the Budget Editable Column's include '(.*)'$/ do |column|
+  create BudgetColumnObject, name: column
+end

data/features/step_definitions/proposal_development/budget_versions.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+When /^I? ?create a budget version for the proposal$/ do
+  @proposal.add_budget_version
+  @budget_version = @proposal.budget_versions[0]
+end
+
+Then /^opening the Budget Version will display a warning about the date change$/ do
+  @budget_version.open_budget
+  on(Parameters).warnings.should include 'The Project Start and/or End Dates have changed from the previous version of this budget. Please update the Project Start and/or End Dates.'
+end
+
+When /^correcting the Budget Version date will remove the warning$/ do
+  @budget_version.default_periods
+  on(Parameters).warnings.size.should be 0
+end
+
+Given /^I? ?create, finalize, and mark complete a budget version for the proposal$/ do
+  @proposal.add_budget_version(status: 'Complete', final: :set)
+end
+
+When /^I? ?copy the budget version \(all periods\)$/ do
+  @copied_budget_version = @proposal.budget_versions.copy_all_periods(@budget_version.name, random_alphanums)
+end
+
+When /^I? ?enter dollar amounts for all the budget periods$/ do
+  @budget_version.budget_periods.each do |p|
+    randomized_values = {}
+    p.dollar_fields[1..-1].each { |f| randomized_values.store(f, random_dollar_value(500000)) }
+    p.edit randomized_values
+  end
+end
+
+Then /^the copied budget's values are all as expected$/ do
+  @copied_budget_version.open_budget
+  @copied_budget_version.budget_periods.each do |period|
+    on Parameters do |page|
+      page.start_date_period(period.number).value.should==period.start_date
+      page.end_date_period(period.number).value.should==period.end_date
+      page.total_sponsor_cost_period(period.number).value.should==(period.direct_cost+period.f_and_a_cost).commas
+      page.direct_cost_period(period.number).value.should==period.direct_cost.commas
+      page.fa_cost_period(period.number).value.should==period.f_and_a_cost.commas
+      page.unrecovered_fa_period(period.number).value.should==period.unrecovered_f_and_a.commas
+      page.cost_sharing_period(period.number).value.should==period.cost_sharing.commas
+      page.cost_limit_period(period.number).value.should==period.cost_limit.commas
+      page.direct_cost_limit_period(period.number).value.should==period.direct_cost_limit.commas
+    end
+  end
+end
+
+When /^I? ?delete one of the budget periods$/ do
+  @budget_version.delete_period(rand(@budget_version.budget_periods.size)+1)
+end
+
+When /^I? ?change the date range for one of the periods$/ do
+  period = @budget_version.budget_periods.sample
+  new_start_date = '03'+period.start_date[/\/\d+\/\d+$/]
+  new_end_date = '10'+period.end_date[/\/\d+\/\d+$/]
+  period.edit start_date: new_start_date, end_date: new_end_date
+  on(Confirmation).yes
+end
+
+When /^I? ?select the default periods for the budget version$/ do
+  @budget_version.default_periods
+end
+
+Then /^all budget periods get recreated, zeroed, and given default date ranges$/ do
+  default_start_dates={1=>@proposal.project_start_date}
+  default_end_dates={@years=>@proposal.project_end_date}
+  1.upto(@years-1) do |i|
+    default_start_dates.store(i+1, "01/01/#{@proposal.project_start_date[/\d+$/].to_i+i}")
+    default_end_dates.store(@years-i, "12/31/#{@proposal.project_end_date[/\d+$/].to_i-i}")
+  end
+  on(Parameters).period_count.should==@years
+  on Parameters do |page|
+    1.upto(@years) do |x|
+      page.start_date_period(x).value.should==default_start_dates[x]
+      page.end_date_period(x).value.should==default_end_dates[x]
+      page.total_sponsor_cost_period(x).value.should=='0.00'
+      page.direct_cost_period(x).value.should=='0.00'
+      page.fa_cost_period(x).value.should=='0.00'
+      page.unrecovered_fa_period(x).value.should=='0.00'
+      page.cost_sharing_period(x).value.should=='0.00'
+      page.cost_limit_period(x).value.should=='0.00'
+      page.direct_cost_limit_period(x).value.should=='0.00'
+    end
+  end
+end
+
+When /^I? ?finalize the budget version$/ do
+  @budget_version.edit final: :set
+end
+
+When /^I? ?mark the budget version complete$/ do
+  @budget_version.edit status: 'Complete'
+end
+
+Then /^I see an error that only one version can be final$/ do
+  on(BudgetVersions).errors.should include 'Only one Budget Version can be marked "Final".'
+end

data/features/step_definitions/proposal_development/edit_proposal.rb

@@ -2,6 +2,10 @@ When /^I? ?recall the proposal$/ do
   @proposal.recall
 end
 
+When /^I? ?reject the proposal$/ do
+  @proposal.reject
+end
+
 When /^I? ?complete a valid simple proposal for a '(.*)' organization$/ do |org|
   @proposal = create ProposalDevelopmentObject, sponsor_type_code: org
   @proposal.add_principal_investigator

data/features/step_definitions/proposal_development/key_personnel_validations.rb

@@ -6,7 +6,10 @@ end
 
 When /^I? ?add (.*) as a Key Person with a role of (.*)$/ do |user_name, kp_role|
   user = get(user_name)
-  @proposal.add_key_person first_name: user.first_name, last_name: user.last_name, role: 'Key Person', key_person_role: kp_role
+  @proposal.add_key_person first_name: user.first_name,
+                           last_name: user.last_name,
+                           role: 'Key Person',
+                           key_person_role: kp_role
 end
 
 And /^I? ?add a (.*) with a (.*) credit split of (.*)$/ do |role, cs_type, amount|
@@ -28,7 +31,9 @@ When /^I? ?add a co-investigator without a unit$/ do
 end
 
 When /^I? ?add a key person with an invalid unit type$/ do
-  @proposal.add_key_person role: 'Key Person', key_person_role: 'king', units: [{number: 'invalid'}]
+  @proposal.add_key_person role: 'Key Person',
+                           key_person_role: 'king',
+                           units: [{number: 'invalid'}]
 end
 
 Then /^a key personnel error should say (.*)$/ do |error|
@@ -73,11 +78,6 @@ end
 When /^the (.*) user approves the proposal$/ do |role|
   get(role).sign_in
   @proposal.open_proposal
-
-
-sleep 20
-
-
   on(ProposalSummary).approve
   on(Confirmation).yes
 end