formtastic-bootstrap 1.0.0 → 1.0.1

Sign up to get free protection for your applications and to get access to all the features.
data/README.md CHANGED
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Make sure you've already downloaded and installed Formtastic!
36
36
  ### Overview
37
37
 
38
38
  In general, Formtastic creates very verbose HTML whereas Bootstrap expects simpler HTML. Every attempt has been
39
- made to generate the HTML expected by Bootstrap while still generating the rich HTML provided by Bootstrap. Here's a pretty typical (simplified) example of what Formtastic generates and what Formtastic Bootstrap generates.
39
+ made to generate the HTML expected by Bootstrap while still generating the rich HTML provided by Formtastic. Here's a pretty typical (simplified) example of what Formtastic generates and what Formtastic Bootstrap generates.
40
40
 
41
41
  #### ERB
42
42
 
@@ -90,9 +90,9 @@ made to generate the HTML expected by Bootstrap while still generating the rich
90
90
 
91
91
  ### Major Difference in Behavior
92
92
 
93
- * Fortastic Bootstrap omits the <tt>label</tt> class on label tags since Twitter Bootstrap uses this tag in another context (and it makes bad things happen.)
94
- * Fortastic Bootstrap puts the <tt>input</tt> label in a different place because it makes Bootstrap behave correctly.
95
- * Fortastic Bootstrap renders <tt>:date</tt>, <tt>:datetime</tt> and <tt>:time</tt> as text fields since this is how Twitter Bootstrap presents these data types (Formtastic renders them as dropdowns.) Some Rails magic may have been lost here. Additionally:
93
+ * Formtastic Bootstrap omits the <tt>label</tt> class on label tags since Twitter Bootstrap uses this tag in another context (and it makes bad things happen.)
94
+ * Formtastic Bootstrap puts the <tt>input</tt> label in a different place because it makes Bootstrap behave correctly.
95
+ * Formtastic Bootstrap renders <tt>:date</tt>, <tt>:datetime</tt> and <tt>:time</tt> as text fields since this is how Twitter Bootstrap presents these data types (Formtastic renders them as dropdowns.) Some Rails magic may have been lost here. Additionally:
96
96
  * <tt>:date</tt> et al are tagged with the <tt>stringish</tt> class.
97
97
  * Hidden fields are not generated.
98
98
  * Fieldsets are simply nested.
data/VERSION CHANGED
@@ -1 +1 @@
1
- 1.0.0
1
+ 1.0.1
@@ -5,11 +5,11 @@
5
5
 
6
6
  Gem::Specification.new do |s|
7
7
  s.name = "formtastic-bootstrap"
8
- s.version = "1.0.0"
8
+ s.version = "1.0.1"
9
9
 
10
10
  s.required_rubygems_version = Gem::Requirement.new(">= 0") if s.respond_to? :required_rubygems_version=
11
11
  s.authors = ["Matthew Bellantoni"]
12
- s.date = "2011-11-08"
12
+ s.date = "2011-11-11"
13
13
  s.description = "Formtastic form builder to generate Twitter Bootstrap-friendly markup."
14
14
  s.email = "mjbellantoni@yahoo.com"
15
15
  s.extra_rdoc_files = [
metadata CHANGED
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2
2
  name: formtastic-bootstrap
3
3
  version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version
4
4
  prerelease:
5
- version: 1.0.0
5
+ version: 1.0.1
6
6
  platform: ruby
7
7
  authors:
8
8
  - Matthew Bellantoni
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ autorequire:
10
10
  bindir: bin
11
11
  cert_chain: []
12
12
 
13
- date: 2011-11-08 00:00:00 Z
13
+ date: 2011-11-11 00:00:00 Z
14
14
  dependencies:
15
15
  - !ruby/object:Gem::Dependency
16
16
  name: formtastic
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ required_ruby_version: !ruby/object:Gem::Requirement
183
183
  requirements:
184
184
  - - ">="
185
185
  - !ruby/object:Gem::Version
186
- hash: -231550788374824554
186
+ hash: -1365601406111032188
187
187
  segments:
188
188
  - 0
189
189
  version: "0"