docile 0.9.0 → 0.9.1

data/README.md

@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
 Definition: *Ready to accept control or instruction; submissive* [[1]]
 
 Tired of overly complex DSL libraries and hairy meta-programming?
-Let's make our Ruby DSLs more *docile*...
+
+Let's make our Ruby DSLs more docile...
 
 [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=docile+definition   "Google"
 
@@ -15,31 +16,36 @@ Let's treat an Array's methods as its own DSL:
 Docile.dsl_eval [] do
   push 1
   push 2
+  pop
+  push 3
 end
 #=> [1, 3]
 ```
 
 Mutating (changing) the array is fine, but what you probably really want as your DSL is actually a [Builder Pattern][2].
 
-For example, if you have a PizzaBuilder class that can build a pizza:
+For example, if you have a PizzaBuilder class that can already build a Pizza:
 
 ``` ruby
 @sauce_level = :extra
-pizza = PizzaBuilder.new.cheese.pepperoni.bacon.sauce(@sauce_level).build
+pizza = PizzaBuilder.new.cheese.pepperoni.sauce(@sauce_level).build
+#=> #<Pizza:0x00001009dc398 @cheese=true, @pepperoni=true, @bacon=false, @sauce=:extra>
 ```
 
-Then you can use this PizzaBuilder class as a DSL:
+Then you can use this same PizzaBuilder class as a DSL:
 
 ``` ruby
 @sauce_level = :extra
 pizza = Docile.dsl_eval PizzaBuilder.new do
   cheese
   pepperoni
-  bacon
   sauce @sauce_level
 end.build
+#=> #<Pizza:0x00001009dc398 @cheese=true, @pepperoni=true, @bacon=false, @sauce=:extra>
 ```
 
+It's just that easy!
+
 [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/328496/when-would-you-use-the-builder-pattern  "Builder Pattern"
 
 ## Features
@@ -47,6 +53,7 @@ end.build
   1.  method lookup falls back from the DSL object to the block's context
   2.  local variable lookup falls back from the DSL object to the block's context
   3.  instance variables are from the block's context only
+  4.  nested dsl evaluation
 
 ## Installation
 

data/lib/docile/version.rb

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 module Docile
-  VERSION = "0.9.0"
+  VERSION = "0.9.1"
 end

data/spec/docile_spec.rb

@@ -4,6 +4,36 @@ describe Docile do
 
   context :dsl_eval do
 
+    it "should return the DSL object" do
+      Docile.dsl_eval([]) do
+        push 1
+        push 2
+        pop
+        push 3
+      end.should == [1, 3]
+    end
+
+    Pizza = Struct.new(:cheese, :pepperoni, :bacon, :sauce)
+
+    class PizzaBuilder
+      def cheese(v=true);    @cheese    = v; end
+      def pepperoni(v=true); @pepperoni = v; end
+      def bacon(v=true);     @bacon     = v; end
+      def sauce(v=nil);      @sauce     = v; end
+      def build
+        Pizza.new(!!@cheese, !!@pepperoni, !!@bacon, @sauce)
+      end
+    end
+
+    it "should handle a Builder pattern" do
+      @sauce = :extra
+      Docile.dsl_eval(PizzaBuilder.new) do
+        bacon
+        cheese
+        sauce @sauce
+      end.build.should == Pizza.new(true, false, true, :extra)
+    end
+
     class InnerDSL
       def initialize; @b = 'b'; end
       attr_accessor :b
@@ -21,15 +51,6 @@ describe Docile do
       Docile.dsl_eval(OuterDSL.new, &block)
     end
 
-    it "should return the DSL object" do
-      Docile.dsl_eval([]) do
-        push 1
-        push 2
-        pop
-        push 3
-      end.should == [1, 3]
-    end
-
     context "methods" do
       it "should find method of outer dsl in outer dsl scope" do
         outer { a.should == 'a' }

metadata

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 name: docile
 version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version 
   prerelease: 
-  version: 0.9.0
+  version: 0.9.1
 platform: ruby
 authors: 
 - Marc Siegel