ae 1.6.0 → 1.6.1

data/HISTORY.rdoc

@@ -1,5 +1,17 @@
 = RELEASE HISTORY
 
+== 1.6.1 / 2010-11-05
+
+This release has test passing for Ruby 1.9.2. Ruby 1.9.2 doesn't appear
+to like &block and block_given? to be used in same method scope. It
+may be a Ruby bug, nonetheless AE has been adjusted to circumvent the
+problem.
+
+Changes:
+
+* Use `&block` and not `block_given?`.
+
+
 == 1.6.0 / 2010-11-04
 
 Support libraries defining toplevel methods, such as `legacy.rb`, now place

data/README.rdoc

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 = Assertive Expressive
 
-* http://proutils.rubyforge.org/ae/
+* home: http://rubyworks.github.com/ae/
+* code: http://github.com/rubyworks/ae/
 
 
 == DESCRIPTION
@@ -86,7 +87,7 @@ Local installation requires Setup.rb.
 
   $ gem install setup
 
-Then download the tarball package from GitHub (under pack/ directory)
+Then download the tarball package from GitHub
 and do:
 
   $ tar -xvzf ae-1.0.0.tgz

data/lib/ae/assertor.rb

@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ class Assertor < AE::BasicObject
   # In other words, should the <code>|| @delegate</code> be dropped?
   #++
   def expect(*args, &block)
-    return self if args.empty? && !block_given?  # same as #assert
+    return self if args.empty? && !block  # same as #assert
 
     target = block || args.shift
 

data/lib/ae/meta/package

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 name    : ae
-date    : 2010-11-04
-version : 1.6.0
+date    : 2010-11-05
+version : 1.6.1
 
 requires:
   - syckle (build)

data/lib/ae/subjunctive.rb

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ module AE
     #
     def be(*args, &block)
       return self if args.empty? && !block
-      block = args.shift if !block_given? && ::Proc === args.first
+      block = args.shift if !block && ::Proc === args.first
       if block
         pass = block.arity > 0 ? block.call(@delegate) : block.call  #@delegate.instance_eval(&block)
         msg = args.shift || @message || block.inspect
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ module AE
     #
     def a(*args, &block)
       return self if args.empty? && !block
-      block = args.shift if !block_given? && ::Proc === args.first
+      block = args.shift if !block && ::Proc === args.first
       if block
         pass = block.arity > 0 ? block.call(@delegate) : block.call  #@delegate.instance_eval(&block)
         msg = args.shift || @message || block.inspect

data/qed/04_subjunctive.rdoc

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ and AE wants to be open to these techniques. One of which
 is how Shoulda (http://shoulda.rubyforge.org) utilizes
 +should+ in a way analogous to RSpec's use of +it+.
 
-Even so, AE provides a an optional mixin called +Subjunctive+ which
+Even so, AE provides an optional mixin called +Subjunctive+ which
 can be used to create assertor methods with English subjunctive
 terms, such as +should+, or +must+, +shall+ and +will+.
 To load this library use:
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ objects. For example:
 It's that easy. Because of their commonality AE provides two such terms,
 +should+ and +must+ as optional add-ons out-of-the-box.
 
-  require 'ae/subjunctive/should'
-  require 'ae/subjunctive/must'
+  require 'ae/should'
+  require 'ae/must'
 
 We will use these two methods interchangeable for the rest of this
 demonstration, but to be clear they both work exactly the same way,

data/qed/05_expect.rdoc

@@ -102,4 +102,3 @@ In which case it works just like #assert, including negative forms.
   10.expect! == 11
   10.forbid  == 11
 
-

metadata

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 --- !ruby/object:Gem::Specification 
 name: ae
 version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version 
-  hash: 15
+  hash: 13
   prerelease: false
   segments: 
   - 1
   - 6
-  - 0
-  version: 1.6.0
+  - 1
+  version: 1.6.1
 platform: ruby
 authors: 
 - Thomas Sawyer